Bug 1051643 - retire docker and provide wmdocker for epel(6+)
Summary: retire docker and provide wmdocker for epel(6+)
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: docker
Version: el6
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Andreas Bierfert
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1038102
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-01-10 18:38 UTC by Lokesh Mandvekar
Modified: 2014-07-01 22:59 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-06-23 12:42:35 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1043676 0 unspecified CLOSED drop docker from rawhide (or redirect to wmdocker) 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC

Internal Links: 1043676

Description Lokesh Mandvekar 2014-01-10 18:38:33 UTC
Description of problem:

All,

The docker / docker-io package naming confusion has been pretty much sorted out for fedora here: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/341 . Conclusion being docker-io becomes docker with f22 and existing docker becomes wmdocker (pretty much done already). But this doesn't quite address epel. 

Since many people are looking to have docker-io renamed to docker in epel (6+), I was hoping Andreas could release wmdocker for epel, and retire the existing docker package.

Here's the procedure that Kevin Fenzi (nirik) proposed on #epel:

1. Get wmdocker maintainer to push a wmdocker into epel6 that obsoletes/provides docker, so people who update get the wmdocker package.
2. get that in stable and wait a while...
3. drop obsoletes/provides on wmdocker
4. get that in stable.
5. push new docker in that's docker-io (for docker-io rpm maintainers)


Comments?

Comment 1 Lokesh Mandvekar 2014-01-10 19:10:33 UTC
Also, comments on using the Epoch suggestion that was proposed for fedora in the ticket?

Comment 2 Daniel Walsh 2014-06-23 12:42:35 UTC
I don't think we are allowed to do this in RHEL6.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.