Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1052162

Summary:	New VMs use display network ports outside of documented 5634 to 6166 range
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager	Reporter:	rhev-integ
Component:	ovirt-engine	Assignee:	Vinzenz Feenstra [evilissimo] <vfeenstr>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Ilanit Stein <istein>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	3.2.0	CC:	acathrow, adahms, chetan, iheim, jentrena, jkt, lpeer, lyarwood, mavital, michal.skrivanek, pstehlik, Rhev-m-bugs, sbonazzo, vfeenstr, yeylon, zdover
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	ZStream
Target Release:	3.3.1
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:	virt
Fixed In Version:	is34	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	Previously, VDSM's documented port range for SPICE was 5634 to 6166, but it used libvirt's default range of 5900 to 65535. Consequently, firewalls set according to this range could erroneously block SPICE traffic. Now, VDSM uses the 5900 to 6923 range for SPICE, which allows concurrent running of up to 512 virtual machines using the SPICE console.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	983088	Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-02-27 09:42:57 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	983088
Bug Blocks:

Comment 2 Ilanit Stein 2014-02-10 15:29:23 UTC

Verified on is34 (upgrade from is32.2):

checked installed rhel host:
 
Before host deploy, /etc/libvirt/qemu.conf
#remote_display_port_min = 5900
#remote_display_port_max = 65535

After host deply:
remote_display_port_min=5900
remote_display_port_max=6923

Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2014-02-27 09:42:57 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0219.html