Spec URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/glite-lb-utils-2.3.9-1/glite-lb-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/glite-lb-utils-2.3.9-1/glite-lb-utils-2.3.9-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: glite-lb-utils are gLite LB utilities used for dumping (glite lb-dump) and purging (glite-lb-purge) data from LB server, for loading (glite-lb-load) data to server, for real time monitoring (glite-lb-mon) and post-mortem statistics (glite-lb-statistics). Fedora Account System Username: valtri * koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6401672 * I'm upstream maintainer
Made a "selfie": http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/glite-lb-utils-2.3.9-1/self-review.txt Almost all gLite L&B packages are in Fedora/EPEL now. This package is runtime dependency for upcoming L&B server package.
Spec URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/glite-lb-utils-2.3.10-1/glite-lb-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/glite-lb-utils-2.3.10-1/glite-lb-utils-2.3.10-1.fc21.src.rpm koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6914958 * New release glite-lb-utils 2.3.10 (gLite L&B 4.1.1)
My first package review. I'll do my best :) Rpmlint detected some warnings. $ rpmlint *.rpm glite-lb-utils.src: W: summary-not-capitalized C gLite Logging and Bookkeeping auxiliary utilities glite-lb-utils.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mon -> Mon, non, min glite-lb-utils.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mortem -> Mort, tremor glite-lb-utils.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C gLite Logging and Bookkeeping auxiliary utilities glite-lb-utils.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mon -> Mon, non, min glite-lb-utils.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mortem -> Mort, tremor ^--- I guess we can ignore these. At least to me there are no spelling mistakes and since gLite is the preferred way to spell it, we should not capitalize it. glite-lb-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary glite-lb-bkpurge-offline glite-lb-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary glite-lb-dump_exporter glite-lb-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary glite-lb-state_history glite-lb-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary glite-lb-statistics 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Man_pages " Man pages are the traditional method of getting help on a unix system. Packages should contain man pages for all binaries/scripts. If it doesn't, work with upstream to add them. Sometimes, other distributions (notably Debian), have man pages for programs. You can use those as a starting point. " You should provide man pages for those binaries. Otherwise it looks good. Just provide man pages and I think this package is good to go. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: glite-lb-utils-2.3.10-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm glite-lb-utils-2.3.10-1.fc20.src.rpm glite-lb-utils.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C gLite Logging and Bookkeeping auxiliary utilities glite-lb-utils.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mon -> Mon, non, min glite-lb-utils.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mortem -> Mort, tremor glite-lb-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary glite-lb-bkpurge-offline glite-lb-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary glite-lb-dump_exporter glite-lb-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary glite-lb-state_history glite-lb-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary glite-lb-statistics glite-lb-utils.src: W: summary-not-capitalized C gLite Logging and Bookkeeping auxiliary utilities glite-lb-utils.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mon -> Mon, non, min glite-lb-utils.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mortem -> Mort, tremor 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint glite-lb-utils glite-lb-utils.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C gLite Logging and Bookkeeping auxiliary utilities glite-lb-utils.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mon -> Mon, non, min glite-lb-utils.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mortem -> Mort, tremor glite-lb-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary glite-lb-bkpurge-offline glite-lb-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary glite-lb-dump_exporter glite-lb-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary glite-lb-state_history glite-lb-utils.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary glite-lb-statistics 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- glite-lb-utils (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/bash glite-lb-state-machine-plugins libc.so.6()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libglite_jobid.so.2()(64bit) libglite_jp_common.so.2()(64bit) libglite_lb_client.so.14()(64bit) libglite_lb_clientpp.so.14()(64bit) libglite_lb_common.so.16()(64bit) libglite_lb_statemachine.so.6()(64bit) libglite_lbu_maildir.so.2()(64bit) libglite_lbu_trio.so.2()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- glite-lb-utils: glite-lb-utils glite-lb-utils(x86-64) Source checksums ---------------- http://scientific.zcu.cz/emi/emi.lb.utils/glite-lb-utils-2.3.10.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : a967f1b6146b5290edca8e4802bc77eb2fe45b152794149bc6e510ead9f9f5b3 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : a967f1b6146b5290edca8e4802bc77eb2fe45b152794149bc6e510ead9f9f5b3 Generated by fedora-review 0.5.1 (bb9bf27) last change: 2013-12-13 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1052852 Buildroot used: fedora-20-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG
Spec URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/glite-lb-utils-2.3.10-2/glite-lb-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/glite-lb-utils-2.3.10-2/glite-lb-utils-2.3.10-2.fc21.src.rpm > My first package review. I'll do my best :) :-) Thanks for the review! > ^--- I guess we can ignore these. At least to me there are no spelling > mistakes and since gLite is the preferred way to spell it, we should not > capitalize it. > I agree. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/ > Guidelines#Man_pages > " > Man pages are the traditional method of getting help on a unix system. > Packages should contain man pages for all binaries/scripts. If it doesn't, > work with upstream to add them. Sometimes, other distributions (notably > Debian), have man pages for programs. You can use those as a starting point. > " > > You should provide man pages for those binaries. Man pages created.
Spec file looks good to me and fedora-review is not complaining either. APPROVED Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: glite-lb-utils-2.3.10-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm glite-lb-utils-2.3.10-2.fc20.src.rpm glite-lb-utils.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C gLite Logging and Bookkeeping auxiliary utilities glite-lb-utils.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mon -> Mon, non, min glite-lb-utils.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mortem -> Mort, tremor glite-lb-utils.src: W: summary-not-capitalized C gLite Logging and Bookkeeping auxiliary utilities glite-lb-utils.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mon -> Mon, non, min glite-lb-utils.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mortem -> Mort, tremor 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint glite-lb-utils glite-lb-utils.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C gLite Logging and Bookkeeping auxiliary utilities glite-lb-utils.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mon -> Mon, non, min glite-lb-utils.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mortem -> Mort, tremor 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- glite-lb-utils (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/bash glite-lb-state-machine-plugins(x86-64) libc.so.6()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libglite_jobid.so.2()(64bit) libglite_jp_common.so.2()(64bit) libglite_lb_client.so.14()(64bit) libglite_lb_clientpp.so.14()(64bit) libglite_lb_common.so.16()(64bit) libglite_lb_statemachine.so.6()(64bit) libglite_lbu_maildir.so.2()(64bit) libglite_lbu_trio.so.2()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- glite-lb-utils: glite-lb-utils glite-lb-utils(x86-64) Source checksums ---------------- http://scientific.zcu.cz/emi/emi.lb.utils/glite-lb-utils-2.3.10.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : a967f1b6146b5290edca8e4802bc77eb2fe45b152794149bc6e510ead9f9f5b3 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : a967f1b6146b5290edca8e4802bc77eb2fe45b152794149bc6e510ead9f9f5b3 Generated by fedora-review 0.5.1 (bb9bf27) last change: 2013-12-13 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1052852 Buildroot used: fedora-20-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: glite-lb-utils Short Description: gLite Logging and Bookkeeping auxiliary utilities Upstream URL: http://glite.cern.ch Owners: valtri Branches: f19 f20 el6 InitialCC:
Git done (by process-git-requests). Please assign the review bug to the reviewer.
glite-lb-utils-2.3.10-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lb-utils-2.3.10-2.fc20
glite-lb-utils-2.3.10-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lb-utils-2.3.10-2.fc19
glite-lb-utils-2.3.10-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glite-lb-utils-2.3.10-2.el6
glite-lb-utils-2.3.10-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository.
glite-lb-utils-2.3.10-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
glite-lb-utils-2.3.10-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.