Bug 1053049 - Suffix used for wrapper-rpm and system-release file differ (el6 vs 6lev)
Summary: Suffix used for wrapper-rpm and system-release file differ (el6 vs 6lev)
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1033118
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager
Classification: Red Hat
Component: rhev-hypervisor
Version: 3.3.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
urgent
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Fabian Deutsch
QA Contact: Pavel Stehlik
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-01-14 15:49 UTC by Fabian Deutsch
Modified: 2014-01-15 22:01 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-01-15 22:01:49 UTC
oVirt Team: ---
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Fabian Deutsch 2014-01-14 15:49:16 UTC 
Description of problem:
This bug is similar to bug 1033118 where the release field of the wrapper-rpm and /etc/system-release file differed because el6 and el6_5 were used.

This bug is about the missing ev suffix (el6ev) in the /etc/system-release file.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Latest RC

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:
/etc/system-release file is missing ev suffix (el6 is used instead)

Expected results:
/etc/system-release file is using the ev suffix (el6ev)

Additional info:
This is a problem in distgit / rhpkg, also tracked here bug 829220.
Comment 1 Fabian Deutsch 2014-01-14 15:51:26 UTC 
Symptoms are:
"A new version is available; an upgrade option will appear once the Host is moved to maintenance mode." in shown in the General Tab in RHEV-M even after an upgrade.
Comment 7 Chris Pelland 2014-01-15 22:01:49 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1033118 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.