Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1053049

Summary:	Suffix used for wrapper-rpm and system-release file differ (el6 vs 6lev)
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager	Reporter:	Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch>
Component:	rhev-hypervisor	Assignee:	Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Pavel Stehlik <pstehlik>
Severity:	urgent	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	3.3.0	CC:	cpelland, eedri, fdeutsch, gklein, iheim, knesenko, yeylon
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-01-15 22:01:49 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Fabian Deutsch 2014-01-14 15:49:16 UTC

Description of problem:
This bug is similar to bug 1033118 where the release field of the wrapper-rpm and /etc/system-release file differed because el6 and el6_5 were used.

This bug is about the missing ev suffix (el6ev) in the /etc/system-release file.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Latest RC

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:
/etc/system-release file is missing ev suffix (el6 is used instead)

Expected results:
/etc/system-release file is using the ev suffix (el6ev)

Additional info:
This is a problem in distgit / rhpkg, also tracked here bug 829220.

Comment 1 Fabian Deutsch 2014-01-14 15:51:26 UTC

Symptoms are:
"A new version is available; an upgrade option will appear once the Host is moved to maintenance mode." in shown in the General Tab in RHEV-M even after an upgrade.

Comment 7 Chris Pelland 2014-01-15 22:01:49 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1033118 ***