Bug 1055499 - copr provides incorrectly repo for rawhide
Summary: copr provides incorrectly repo for rawhide
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Copr
Classification: Community
Component: frontend
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Miroslav Suchý
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-01-20 12:14 UTC by Igor Gnatenko
Modified: 2014-02-06 08:32 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: copr-1.25-1
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-02-06 08:32:03 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Proposed patch against master branch (1.33 KB, patch)
2014-01-20 12:16 UTC, Igor Gnatenko
no flags Details | Diff

Description Igor Gnatenko 2014-01-20 12:14:42 UTC
For example:
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/ignatenkobrain/ocltoys/repo/fedora-rawhide-i386/

On rawhide copr provides fedora-$releasever-$basearch, which incorrectly for rawhide. We should provide fedora-rawhide-$basearch.


Some examples from fedora repos:

fedora-rawhide.repo (fedora-release-rawhide.noarch)
baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/$basearch/os/

fedora.repo (fedora-release.noarch)
baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/$releasever/Everything/$basearch/os/

Comment 1 Igor Gnatenko 2014-01-20 12:16:18 UTC
Created attachment 852722 [details]
Proposed patch against master branch

I've not tested this patch, but it should works ;)

Comment 2 Miroslav Suchý 2014-01-20 13:08:22 UTC
Applied as commit 0a07fda. Thanks for the patch.

Comment 3 Igor Gnatenko 2014-01-20 13:27:27 UTC
(In reply to Miroslav Suchý from comment #2)
> Applied as commit 0a07fda. Thanks for the patch.
No problem. When it will implemented at https://copr.fedoraproject.org/ ?

P.S. you could commit this patch from my name or add Signed-off tag ;)

Comment 4 Miroslav Suchý 2014-01-20 13:36:43 UTC
Sometimes during this week.

Sorry for not applying it as "git-am", I clicked on link in #1 which show it as just diff. Now I see that you sent it in proper format and it was my misuse of bugzilla. Sorry.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.