Bug 1056185 - go test code.google.com/p/go.net/ipv6 test fails
Summary: go test code.google.com/p/go.net/ipv6 test fails
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: golang-googlecode-net
Version: el6
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Lokesh Mandvekar
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-01-21 16:21 UTC by Tuomo Soini
Modified: 2015-01-26 20:12 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: golang-googlecode-net-0-0.19.hg937a34c9de13.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-01-26 20:12:40 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Tuomo Soini 2014-01-21 16:21:41 UTC
Description of problem:

%check fails if machine you build this package on has ipv6 connectivity.

+ go test code.google.com/p/go.net/ipv6
--- FAIL: TestConnInitiatorPathMTU (0.00 seconds)
        sockopt_test.go:58: ipv6.Conn.PathMTU failed: getsockopt: protocol not available
--- FAIL: TestConnResponderPathMTU (0.00 seconds)
        sockopt_test.go:91: ipv6.Conn.PathMTU failed: getsockopt: protocol not available
--- FAIL: TestPacketConnReadWriteUnicastUDP (0.00 seconds)
        unicast_test.go:120: ipv6.PacketConn.SetControlMessage failed: setsockopt: protocol not available
FAIL
FAIL    code.google.com/p/go.net/ipv6   0.041s
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.DbihRB (%check)

I guess package is broken for ipv6.

Comment 1 Tuomo Soini 2014-01-21 16:22:32 UTC
Forgot to tell the version: 0-0.13.hg84a4013f96e0.el6

Comment 2 Lokesh Mandvekar 2014-01-21 16:30:33 UTC
yup, I see this now, I'll disable ipv6 check for el6.

Comment 3 Lokesh Mandvekar 2014-01-21 16:33:38 UTC
I don't think it hurts to have %{import_path}/ipv6 installed for el6 (but not 'go test'ed) though.

Comment 4 Vincent Batts 2014-01-21 16:46:02 UTC
since that source tarball, there have been a little bit of work done upstream on the ipv6 package.

Before patching out tests, perhaps we should test on a newer snapshot of the repo?

changeset:   106:f720bab54225
user:        Mikio Hara <mikioh.mikioh>
date:        Wed Jan 01 18:06:29 2014 +0900
summary:     go.net/ipv6: better readability in test

changeset:   105:7aeb0fe2819e
user:        Mikio Hara <mikioh.mikioh>
date:        Tue Dec 31 23:24:59 2013 +0900
summary:     go.net/ipv6: add missing API tests

changeset:   104:e0d7bfced6e2
user:        Mikio Hara <mikioh.mikioh>
date:        Tue Dec 31 23:21:39 2013 +0900
summary:     go.net/ipv6: remove unused test code

changeset:   103:45528560020f
user:        Mikio Hara <mikioh.mikioh>
date:        Tue Dec 31 23:20:52 2013 +0900
summary:     go.net/ipv6: simplfy control message marshaling

changeset:   94:75017ecb835f
user:        Mikio Hara <mikioh.mikioh>
date:        Wed Nov 06 21:33:49 2013 +0900
summary:     go.net/ipv6: make it work with Go 1.1


changeset:   93:6aba239cf27b
user:        Mikio Hara <mikioh.mikioh>
date:        Tue Nov 05 10:09:42 2013 +0900
summary:     go.net/ipv6: implement getsockopt, setsockopt syscalls

Comment 5 Lokesh Mandvekar 2014-01-21 16:47:08 UTC
sure thing

Comment 6 Lokesh Mandvekar 2014-01-21 17:00:51 UTC
so the latest revision seems to use %{import_path}/html/charset as well, and a check for them yields this: http://fpaste.org/70381/32344213/ ...we might need to package another code.google.com/p/go.text, not sure if something provides this already

Comment 7 Tuomo Soini 2014-01-25 21:53:42 UTC
Same issue with epel7.

Comment 8 Tuomo Soini 2014-01-26 09:53:46 UTC
Another minor issue on epel7:

%if 0%{?fedora} >= 19
BuildArch:      noarch
%else

Shouldn't this be:

%if 0%{?fedora} >= 19 || 0%{?rhel} >= 7
BuildArch:      noarch
%else

Comment 9 Tuomo Soini 2014-01-26 09:59:42 UTC
Tuomo Soini from comment #8)
> Another minor issue on epel7:
> 
> %if 0%{?fedora} >= 19
> BuildArch:      noarch
> %else
> 
> Shouldn't this be:
> 
> %if 0%{?fedora} >= 19 || 0%{?rhel} >= 7
> BuildArch:      noarch
> %else

Actually there is a reason for being arch dependant on epel7 so ignore this.

Comment 10 Lokesh Mandvekar 2014-01-26 23:24:01 UTC
(In reply to Tuomo Soini from comment #9)
> Tuomo Soini from comment #8)
> > Another minor issue on epel7:
> > 
> > %if 0%{?fedora} >= 19
> > BuildArch:      noarch
> > %else
> > 
> > Shouldn't this be:
> > 
> > %if 0%{?fedora} >= 19 || 0%{?rhel} >= 7
> > BuildArch:      noarch
> > %else
> 
> Actually there is a reason for being arch dependant on epel7 so ignore this.

Hi Tuomo,

So past few days I've observed that "go test ..../ipv6" passes without exception for dist-6E-epel, no matter how many times I try.

Moreover, BuildArch: noarch seems to work for all branches, dist-6E-epel and epel7 included.

Anybody got a clue if something magically changed in koji or golang?

I'd appreciate more eyes and more feedback on this, but for now I feel having BuildArch: noarch for all branches and having ipv6 test enabled should be the way to go.

Comments?

Comment 12 Tuomo Soini 2014-01-27 06:44:32 UTC
Afaik builders don't have ipv6 connectivity so ipv6 tests are not actually doing real tests. Poblem only happens if you build on a machine with ipv6 connectivity where ipv6 tests can really happen.

Work-aound fo the poblem for now is adding || : at the end of ipv6 test line so failure which happens 100% of build times on a machine with ipv6 connectivity doesn't prevent building package and you could add a comment about ipv6 tests being completely broken on linux.

Comment 13 Vincent Batts 2014-01-27 14:47:43 UTC
(In reply to Tuomo Soini from comment #12)
> Afaik builders don't have ipv6 connectivity so ipv6 tests are not actually
> doing real tests. Poblem only happens if you build on a machine with ipv6
> connectivity where ipv6 tests can really happen.

the test failure is not around ipv6 connectivity. it is failing on particular syscalls on rhel6

> Work-aound fo the poblem for now is adding || : at the end of ipv6 test line
> so failure which happens 100% of build times on a machine with ipv6
> connectivity doesn't prevent building package and you could add a comment
> about ipv6 tests being completely broken on linux.

||: would be a total hack in this situation. that would ignore all tests, for the sake of a single failed case.

Comment 14 Tuomo Soini 2014-01-27 15:58:16 UTC
My suggestion was to ignore ipv6 tests, not all tests.

-GOPATH=%{buildroot}/%{gopath} go test %{import_path}/ipv6
+GOPATH=%{buildroot}/%{gopath} go test %{import_path}/ipv6 || :

When I checked the test cases I saw they skipped all testing if ipv6 is not supported so this wouldn't change anything from current situation.

Comment 16 Tuomo Soini 2014-07-10 09:07:50 UTC
How about fixing this issue?

Comment 17 Fedora Update System 2014-07-11 18:27:36 UTC
golang-googlecode-net-0-0.15.hg84a4013f96e0.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-googlecode-net-0-0.15.hg84a4013f96e0.fc19

Comment 18 Fedora Update System 2014-07-11 18:28:10 UTC
golang-googlecode-net-0-0.15.hg84a4013f96e0.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-googlecode-net-0-0.15.hg84a4013f96e0.fc20

Comment 19 Fedora Update System 2014-07-11 18:29:11 UTC
golang-googlecode-net-0-0.15.hg84a4013f96e0.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-googlecode-net-0-0.15.hg84a4013f96e0.el6

Comment 20 Fedora Update System 2014-07-12 19:45:52 UTC
Package golang-googlecode-net-0-0.15.hg84a4013f96e0.el6:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing golang-googlecode-net-0-0.15.hg84a4013f96e0.el6'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1890/golang-googlecode-net-0-0.15.hg84a4013f96e0.el6
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

Comment 21 Fedora Update System 2014-08-01 16:42:39 UTC
golang-googlecode-net-0-0.15.hg84a4013f96e0.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 22 Fedora Update System 2014-08-01 23:54:50 UTC
golang-googlecode-net-0-0.15.hg84a4013f96e0.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 23 Fedora Update System 2014-08-01 23:55:42 UTC
golang-googlecode-net-0-0.15.hg84a4013f96e0.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 24 Tuomo Soini 2014-10-06 16:07:31 UTC
0-0.16.hg90e232e2462d.el6 has this ipv6 issue again.

Lokesh: when you updated you removed ipv6 test work-around.

Comment 25 Lokesh Mandvekar 2014-10-06 23:49:06 UTC
argh, sorry, I'll check and revert.

Comment 26 Tuomo Soini 2014-11-26 17:21:14 UTC
0-0.17.hg90e232e2462d.el6 has still ipv6 issue again.

Comment 27 Fedora Update System 2014-12-19 00:20:51 UTC
golang-googlecode-net-0-0.19.hg937a34c9de13.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-googlecode-net-0-0.19.hg937a34c9de13.el6

Comment 28 Fedora Update System 2014-12-20 00:15:53 UTC
Package golang-googlecode-net-0-0.19.hg937a34c9de13.el6:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing golang-googlecode-net-0-0.19.hg937a34c9de13.el6'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-4796/golang-googlecode-net-0-0.19.hg937a34c9de13.el6
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

Comment 29 Fedora Update System 2015-01-26 20:12:40 UTC
golang-googlecode-net-0-0.19.hg937a34c9de13.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.