Bug 1056232
| Summary: | Deleting a Data Center with Clusters on it | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] oVirt | Reporter: | Vitor de Lima <vitor.lima> |
| Component: | ovirt-engine-core | Assignee: | Eli Mesika <emesika> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | bugs <bugs> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 3.4 | CC: | acathrow, emesika, gklein, gustavo.pedrosa, iheim, leonardo.bianconi, ofrenkel, vitor.lima, yeylon |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 3.4.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | infra | ||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-02-18 11:18:19 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Vitor de Lima
2014-01-21 18:11:47 UTC
Setting target release to current version for consideration and review. please do not push non-RFE bugs to an undefined target release to make sure bugs are reviewed for relevancy, fix, closure, etc. why this is a bug? where this behavior cause aby issue? when you remove the DC, clusters has no DC, and user can re-assign them to a new DC. please note that you cannot remove DC with vms/templates so there should not be any issue. Sorry, I thought the missing data center in these orphaned clusters could cause issues later on, but if it isn't the case, no problem. Do you think preventing this kind of removal is a good idea? i dont see a reason to prevent deleting such DC, unless we find this makes an issue. afaik, its not an issue, and i prefer not to block user from doing actions without a good reason for that. (In reply to Vitor de Lima from comment #3) > Sorry, I thought the missing data center in these orphaned clusters could > cause issues later on, but if it isn't the case, no problem. Do you think > preventing this kind of removal is a good idea? Vitor , did you use just remove or "force remove" to achieve that ??? IIRC this is not enable unless you check the force option If you did that using the force option then it is functions as designed , if not and still you had removed the DC its a bug and it should be resolved I just used the "normal" remove. If the clusters have no Hosts/VMs this is OK and should closed as NOTABUG as Omer noted in comment 2 Any objection ? No problem, I will just abandon the change that modifies this behavior. |