Bug 1057531
| Summary: | [RFE] avoid contradictory policies (level 1) for Affinity groups. | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] oVirt | Reporter: | Antoni Segura Puimedon <asegurap> | ||||
| Component: | ovirt-engine-webadmin | Assignee: | Tomer Saban <tsaban> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Artyom <alukiano> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 3.4 | CC: | bazulay, bugs, dfediuck, ecohen, gklein, iheim, istein, mgoldboi, rbalakri, yeylon | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Triaged | ||||
| Target Release: | 3.6.0 | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | sla | ||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2015-11-04 11:19:49 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | SLA | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Antoni Segura Puimedon
2014-01-24 09:46:47 UTC
Setting target release to current version for consideration and review. please do not push non-RFE bugs to an undefined target release to make sure bugs are reviewed for relevancy, fix, closure, etc. This is an automated message. Re-targeting all non-blocker bugs still open on 3.4.0 to 3.4.1. Propose to move to future or closed won't fix. Created attachment 883247 [details]
Contradicting affinity policies
Toni, Attaching a screenshot to demonstrate it is possible to create contradicting policies. So the new policy does show up. The question is if you refer to policy visibility (which as you can see is supported) or something else? This is an automated message. oVirt 3.4.1 has been released. This issue has been retargeted to 3.5.0 since it has not been marked as high priority or severity issue, please retarget if needed. It didn't show up for me then, my question is whether this should be allowed at all. It doesn't make much sense to allow creation of conflicting policies, the user should, at least, get a nice warning. We'll handle it for level 1 which means we validate immediate membership without transitioning. This should be resolved using a can-do-action on affinity group creation / editing. ovirt-3.6.0-3 release Verified on rhevm-3.6.0-0.12.master.el6.noarch Error while executing action: Affinity Group collision detected in unified affinity group: [619070e8-170a-4565-be61-a165fb5a42af, d84baebd-6014-4914-89a1-a80c4cb48b68] and negative affinity group: [d84baebd-6014-4914-89a1-a80c4cb48b68, 619070e8-170a-4565-be61-a165fb5a42af] oVirt 3.6.0 has been released on November 4th, 2015 and should fix this issue. If problems still persist, please open a new BZ and reference this one. |