RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1057805 - Size returned by slapi_entry_size is not accurate
Summary: Size returned by slapi_entry_size is not accurate
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: 389-ds-base
Version: 6.4
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Rich Megginson
QA Contact: Sankar Ramalingam
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1061410
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-01-24 23:40 UTC by Noriko Hosoi
Modified: 2020-09-13 20:55 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-34.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Cause: Calculating the size of entry in the memory was under estimated. Consequence: The entry cache size was larger than the specified size in the configuration. Result: The size of the entry cache is more accurate by calculating each entry size more accurately.
Clone Of:
: 1064006 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-10-14 07:52:56 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github 389ds 389-ds-base issues 1014 0 None None None 2020-09-13 20:55:33 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2014:1385 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE 389-ds-base bug fix and enhancement update 2014-10-14 01:27:42 UTC

Description Noriko Hosoi 2014-01-24 23:40:34 UTC 
This bug is created as a clone of upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47677

1) slapi_dn_size implemented as a static function in entry.c is obsolete.
   It can be replaced with a slapi api slapi_sdn_get_size.
2) size of e_virtual_lock could be added to the size.
Comment 2 Noriko Hosoi 2014-06-26 23:50:55 UTC 
This is a part of our effort preventing the server size growth.  To verify the bug, using some long running tests (e.g., reliability), check the server size before and after.  If the delta is reasonable, we could claim this fix was verified.
Comment 3 Viktor Ashirov 2014-07-24 12:01:42 UTC 
Noriko, could you please elaborate on verification steps? 
What is meant by server size? Value of RSS of a process? 
What size of a delta is considered reasonable? Several megabytes, tens of megabytes? 
Thank you!
Comment 4 Noriko Hosoi 2014-07-24 17:05:31 UTC 
(In reply to Viktor Ashirov from comment #3)
> Noriko, could you please elaborate on verification steps? 
> What is meant by server size? Value of RSS of a process? 
> What size of a delta is considered reasonable? Several megabytes, tens of
> megabytes? 
> Thank you!

Viktor, unfortunately, the delta is subtle and various.  There's no clear steps to verify this particular change.

I think sanity check is good enough for this bug.
Comment 5 Sankar Ramalingam 2014-09-17 18:09:09 UTC 
Recent reliab15 execution against build 1.2.11.15-45 running fine. No issues reported from the execution. Hence, marking the bug as Verified as Sanity only.

Beaker job - https://beaker.engineering.redhat.com/jobs/749819
Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2014-10-14 07:52:56 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1385.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.