Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1058735

Summary: javaws leads to segmentation fault
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Tarun Sen <tarunsen>
Component: java-1.7.0-oracleAssignee: jiri vanek <jvanek>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: BaseOS QE - Apps <qe-baseos-apps>
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.4CC: tarunsen
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-01-29 12:18:43 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
dumped core file none

Description Tarun Sen 2014-01-28 13:03:24 UTC
Created attachment 856576 [details]
dumped core file

Description of problem: when we trying to start javaws without any option it leads to segmentation fault. 

This bug can be reproduce by using any jnlp.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

java version "1.7.0_25"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_25-b15)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.25-b01, mixed mode)

Linux 2.6.32-358.el6.x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

How reproducible:
each time


Steps to Reproduce:
1. javaws http://192.168.250.108/web/test.jnlp

Actual results:
Segmentation Fault

Expected results:
Application Window

Additional info:
This Bug can be bypass by giving any parameter in javaws command.
like:  javaws -J http://192.168.250.108/web/test.jnlp
       javaws -verbose http://192.168.250.108/web/test.jnlp

Comment 2 jiri vanek 2014-01-28 13:34:53 UTC
Was the test.jnlp   intended to be public? The url  you provided leads to your local network. Also, why so outdated jdk?

Comment 3 Tarun Sen 2014-01-29 06:49:22 UTC
same error can be reproduce by public domain jnlp also 
like 

javaws http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorialJWS/samples/deployment/dynamictree_webstartJWSProject/dynamictree_webstart.jnlp


we using JDK 1.7 because our most of servers are build on it.

Comment 4 jiri vanek 2014-01-29 12:18:43 UTC
(In reply to Tarun Sen from comment #3)
> same error can be reproduce by public domain jnlp also 
> like 
> 
> javaws
> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorialJWS/samples/deployment/
> dynamictree_webstartJWSProject/dynamictree_webstart.jnlp
> 
> 
> we using JDK 1.7 because our most of servers are build on it.

Sure, but  25_b15
Latest is 51...

It seems that thisis really replicable  25, but not in updated one. Please update.

There is nothing more I can recommend to you for proprietary blob.