RDO tickets are now tracked in Jira https://issues.redhat.com/projects/RDO/issues/
Bug 1059417 - Errors when setting CONFIG_NEUTRON_OVS_TUNNEL_IF to a VLAN interface
Summary: Errors when setting CONFIG_NEUTRON_OVS_TUNNEL_IF to a VLAN interface
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: RDO
Classification: Community
Component: openstack-foreman-installer
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Jason Guiditta
QA Contact: Ofer Blaut
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1057938
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-01-29 20:14 UTC by Mike Orazi
Modified: 2014-09-16 19:02 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: openstack-foreman-installer-1.0.4-1.el6ost
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1057938
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-09-16 19:02:14 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Mike Orazi 2014-01-29 20:14:47 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1057938 +++

As reported on ask.openstack.org:

  https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/10810/in-ethernet-device-name-causing-packstack-parse-error/

Setting CONFIG_NEUTRON_OVS_TUNNEL_IF to a VLAN defice (such as "eth0.1200") will result in packstack generating a manifest that attempts to reference `$ipaddress_eth0.1200`, which is an invalid variable/fact name.

Facter converts the `.` in the interface name to `_`, so the corresponding fact is `ipaddress_eth0_1200`.  Either packstack or the Puppet modules should take care of performing the appropriate transliteration.

--- Additional comment from Lars Kellogg-Stedman on 2014-01-25 23:23:08 EST ---

The same problem affects foreman users.

--- Additional comment from Martin Magr on 2014-01-27 09:19:20 EST ---

This cannot be fixed on module level. Both packstack and foreman have to have valid manifests.

--- Additional comment from Lars Kellogg-Stedman on 2014-01-27 10:36:08 EST ---

Martin,

I agree with second part of comment #2, but I'm not sure what you mean by "this cannot be fixed on the module level".

--- Additional comment from Lars Kellogg-Stedman on 2014-01-29 11:10:03 EST ---

This same problem also affects the Swift templates.  From jjozwiak:

> When deploying Swift storage the 'swift_local_interface' was similar
> where it needed to be em2_102.

--- Additional comment from Lars Kellogg-Stedman on 2014-01-29 14:37:17 EST ---

Proposed fix for astapor in https://github.com/redhat-openstack/astapor/pull/109.

--- Additional comment from Lars Kellogg-Stedman on 2014-01-29 14:57:55 EST ---

Proposed fix for packstack in https://github.com/stackforge/packstack/pull/10.

Comment 1 Jason Guiditta 2014-01-31 20:20:08 UTC
Lars has a patch for this that should be merged shortly


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.