Description of problem:
SELinux is preventing /usr/lib64/erlang/erts-5.10.4/bin/beam.smp from name_bind access on the tcp_socket resulting in ejabberd.service failed to start.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ejabberd-2.1.13-7.fc20.x86_64
selinux-policy-3.12.1-119.fc20.noarch

How reproducible:
Always.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum install ejabberd
2. systemctl start ejabberd.service

Actual results:
SELinux is preventing /usr/lib64/erlang/erts-5.10.4/bin/beam.smp from name_bind access on the tcp_socket .

*****  Plugin bind_ports (92.2 confidence) suggests   ************************

If you want to allow /usr/lib64/erlang/erts-5.10.4/bin/beam.smp to bind to network port 5280
Then you need to modify the port type.
Do
# semanage port -a -t PORT_TYPE -p tcp 5280
    where PORT_TYPE is one of the following: amqp_port_t, couchdb_port_t, jabber_client_port_t, jabber_interserver_port_t.

*****  Plugin catchall_boolean (7.83 confidence) suggests   ******************

If you want to allow nis to enabled
Then you must tell SELinux about this by enabling the 'nis_enabled' boolean.
You can read 'None' man page for more details.
Do
setsebool -P nis_enabled 1

*****  Plugin catchall (1.41 confidence) suggests   **************************

If you believe that beam.smp should be allowed name_bind access on the  tcp_socket by default.
Then you should report this as a bug.
You can generate a local policy module to allow this access.
Do
allow this access for now by executing:
# grep beam.smp /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow -M mypol
# semodule -i mypol.pp


Additional Information:
Source Context                system_u:system_r:rabbitmq_beam_t:s0
Target Context                system_u:object_r:unreserved_port_t:s0
Target Objects                 [ tcp_socket ]
Source                        beam.smp
Source Path                   /usr/lib64/erlang/erts-5.10.4/bin/beam.smp
Port                          5280
Host                          srv9.kola.fad.ru
Source RPM Packages           erlang-erts-R16B-03.1.fc20.x86_64
Target RPM Packages           
Policy RPM                    selinux-policy-3.12.1-119.fc20.noarch
Selinux Enabled               True
Policy Type                   targeted
Enforcing Mode                Enforcing
Host Name                     srv9.kola.fad.ru
Platform                      Linux srv9.kola.fad.ru 3.12.7-300.fc20.x86_64 #1
                              SMP Fri Jan 10 15:35:31 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64
Alert Count                   2
First Seen                    2014-01-31 03:45:45 MSK
Last Seen                     2014-01-31 03:57:01 MSK
Local ID                      2224fce7-a18c-4fea-b21a-c51da09807d4

Raw Audit Messages
type=AVC msg=audit(1391126221.107:17780): avc:  denied  { name_bind } for  pid=11054 comm="beam.smp" src=5280 scontext=system_u:system_r:rabbitmq_beam_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:unreserved_port_t:s0 tclass=tcp_socket


type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1391126221.107:17780): arch=x86_64 syscall=bind success=no exit=EACCES a0=15 a1=7f2568eaf980 a2=10 a3=1 items=0 ppid=1 pid=11054 auid=4294967295 uid=994 gid=993 euid=994 suid=994 fsuid=994 egid=993 sgid=993 fsgid=993 ses=4294967295 tty=(none) comm=beam.smp exe=/usr/lib64/erlang/erts-5.10.4/bin/beam.smp subj=system_u:system_r:rabbitmq_beam_t:s0 key=(null)

Hash: beam.smp,rabbitmq_beam_t,unreserved_port_t,tcp_socket,name_bind

Additional info:
Port 5280/tcp - ejabberd web interface (captcha, http_bind, http_poll, register, web_admin) by default.

Supposed to resolve with
> semanage port -a -t PORT_TYPE -p tcp 5280
But can't decide what port type should I use.
Setroubleshoot proposed port types don't match the purpose well.