Bug 1060636 - Dialogue for attaching ISOs is not logically ordered
Summary: Dialogue for attaching ISOs is not logically ordered
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager
Classification: Red Hat
Component: ovirt-engine-webadmin-portal
Version: 3.3.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: 3.4.0
Assignee: Ravi Nori
QA Contact: Tareq Alayan
Whiteboard: infra
Depends On:
Blocks: 1062958 rhev3.4beta 1142926
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2014-02-03 06:48 UTC by Tomas Dosek
Modified: 2019-04-28 09:11 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version: av1
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Previously, ISO files uploaded to the ISO domain of a Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager were not ordered alphabetically or numerically. Now, all ISO files are ordered in decreasing order in accordance with their version and release numbers.
Clone Of:
: 1062958 (view as bug list)
Last Closed: 2014-06-09 15:03:29 UTC
oVirt Team: Infra
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Screenshot (439.22 KB, image/png)
2014-02-03 06:48 UTC, Tomas Dosek
no flags Details
screenshot (222.04 KB, image/png)
2014-02-17 16:52 UTC, Tareq Alayan
no flags Details

System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2014:0506 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Moderate: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager 3.4.0 update 2014-06-09 18:55:38 UTC
oVirt gerrit 24019 0 None None None Never
oVirt gerrit 24168 0 None None None Never

Description Tomas Dosek 2014-02-03 06:48:06 UTC
Created attachment 858387 [details]

Description of problem:
Dialogue for attaching ISOs is not logically ordered.
Please take a look at the attached screenshot.

First the dialogue orders 2014 sort of alphabetically,
but then it does the same for 2013 which doesn't really look good.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:
100 %

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Upload ISOs that are on the screenshot to ISO domain
2. Try to attach them to VM

Actual results:
The list is ordered in non alphabetic, non numeric way, not sure how it's ordered at all

Expected results:
full alpha-numeric ordering should be done

Comment 2 Tareq Alayan 2014-02-17 13:21:09 UTC
is it also merged to upstream?

Comment 3 Eli Mesika 2014-02-17 15:09:25 UTC
(In reply to Tareq Alayan from comment #2)
> is it also merged to upstream?


Comment 4 Tareq Alayan 2014-02-17 16:51:35 UTC
see screenshot

Comment 5 Tareq Alayan 2014-02-17 16:52:12 UTC
Created attachment 864201 [details]

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2014-06-09 15:03:29 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.