This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions of Fedora. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When creating a Bodhi update request, please use the bodhi submission link noted in the next comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as the relevant top-level CVE bugs. Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the Bodhi notes field when available. Please note: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. Only one tracking bug has been filed; please ensure that it is only closed when all affected versions are fixed. [bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs]
Please use the following update submission link to create the Bodhi request for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as this tracking bug. This will ensure that all associated bugs get updated when new packages are pushed to stable. Please also ensure that the "Close bugs when update is stable" option remains checked. Bodhi update submission link: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/?type_=security&bugs=1063671,1063672
Upstream has fixed the Issue https://bitbucket.org/nicfit/eyed3/commits/372bbacb7a70
I gave up primary ownership of this package a few years back when cicku updated the package. Seem I forgot to update thhe package db to reflect this. I won't have access to a fedora machine for a few weeks (I'm traveling on vacation) so it's best if cicku updated this.
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Thanks, If cicku can't do it, I can apply for comaintainer ship of this package do the needful.
(In reply to Niranjan Mallapadi Raghavender from comment #5) > Thanks, > > If cicku can't do it, I can apply for comaintainer ship of this package do > the needful. That sounds fine.
Cicku could you please update the package with the fix provided by upstream, In case you can't, could you please approve commit access request by fas account PJP , so that he can push the security update.
cicku/ bpebble could you approve the commit request for FAS A/c PJP to update the package with security fix ?
I approved the commit request.
This is fixed in following updates: -> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15450/python-eyed3-0.7.4-4.fc21 -> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15464/python-eyed3-0.7.4-4.fc20 -> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15477/python-eyed3-0.7.4-4.fc19
Hello i, You plan to fix this soon?
This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 20. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '20'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 20 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.