Description of problem: Backup-Restore API allows us to back up & restore VM, but it backs up only the disks, there is no way to back up the memory that is saved as part of the Snapshot that was created for the backup. So it is impossible to backup VM and start it again with the exact same state it had when it is restored. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Cannot back up VM using the Backup-Restore API and start it with the exact same state it had in the moment the backup snapshot was taken, after the VM is restored Expected results: It might be useful to be able to start the VM with the exact same state it had at the moment the backup snapshot was taken, after the VM is restored using the Backup-Restore API Additional info:
Setting target release to current version for consideration and review. please do not push non-RFE bugs to an undefined target release to make sure bugs are reviewed for relevancy, fix, closure, etc.
We need a proper way to treat memory volumes first. Once the RFE described in bug 1150239 is handled, this should be revisited.
Pushing out to 4.0.0, as we depend on bug 1150239.
This is an automated message. This Bugzilla report has been opened on a version which is not maintained anymore. Please check if this bug is still relevant in oVirt 3.5.4. If it's not relevant anymore, please close it (you may use EOL or CURRENT RELEASE resolution) If it's an RFE please update the version to 4.0 if still relevant.
This is an automated message. This Bugzilla report has been opened on a version which is not maintained anymore. Please check if this bug is still relevant in oVirt 3.5.4 and reopen if still an issue.
Still a requirement.
Target release should be placed once a package build is known to fix a issue. Since this bug is not modified, the target version has been reset. Please use target milestone to plan a fix for a oVirt release.
Can this be done with memory disk modeling in 4.0?
(In reply to Yaniv Dary from comment #8) > Can this be done with memory disk modeling in 4.0? Yes
Closing old bugs, please reopen if still needed, in any case patches are welcome.