Bug 1064574
| Summary: | [RFE] Add ISO+export options to "add more storage" in data center guide-me | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [oVirt] ovirt-engine | Reporter: | Matt Reid <mreid> | ||||
| Component: | Frontend.WebAdmin | Assignee: | Allon Mureinik <amureini> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | Raz Tamir <ratamir> | ||||
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | --- | CC: | bugs, cnegus, gklein, jmatthew, rbalakri, Rhev-m-bugs, sfolkwil, srevivo, ykaul, ylavi | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Improvement | ||||
| Target Release: | --- | Flags: | ylavi:
ovirt-future?
rule-engine: planning_ack? rule-engine: devel_ack? rule-engine: testing_ack? |
||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | |||||||
| : | 1065731 (view as bug list) | Environment: | |||||
| Last Closed: | 2017-03-13 11:00:11 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | Storage | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1065731 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Matt Reid
2014-02-12 21:29:00 UTC
Created attachment 862537 [details]
Only Data / NFS offered as choice from dialog
In 3.2 there are specific storage types for data center, in this case (screenshot) NFS. In this case it's acceptable to only add an nfs storage domain. Opening another bug on docs as a clone. Please note that KCS articles are not part of the official product documentation suite, and are subject to frequent change. Chris Negus is most likely the author of this document. Chris, can you please confirm this is your document so I can change the assignee to you? (In reply to Jodi Biddle from comment #3) > Please note that KCS articles are not part of the official product > documentation suite, and are subject to frequent change. Chris Negus is most > likely the author of this document. > > Chris, can you please confirm this is your document so I can change the > assignee to you? There are two issues here: 1. A lacking feature in the product ("future feature", "improvement", call it what you will) - the Guide Me dialog should allow adding ISO and Export domains. 2. The fact that the KCS article conveys wrong information in light of the /current/ product's features. Both issues need to be solved at some point of time or the other (based on the relevant assignee's prioritization), and both need to be tracked. So far, we've been using this BZ to track issue (1). Jodi/Chris - unfortunately, I'm not really familiar with the work-process for content engineering. How should we track issue (2) in a way it won't interfere with tracking issue (1)? Add a doc-text-required flag? Open a new bug? Something else? Thanks in advance, Allon (In reply to Jodi Biddle from comment #3) > Please note that KCS articles are not part of the official product > documentation suite, and are subject to frequent change. Chris Negus is most > likely the author of this document. > > Chris, can you please confirm this is your document so I can change the > assignee to you? Yes. The article https://access.redhat.com/site/articles/703153 is my document. I'll make the fix and respond back here when it is done. I fixed the article: https://access.redhat.com/site/articles/703153. It now notes that only DATA/NFS should be available as the storage type, since that was the storage type assigned to the datacenter. I'm not sure if we should fix this, as we are trying to make iso/export being "just paths", rather than storage domains. Closing, as we hope to deprecate both domain types in the future. |