Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/avasyukov/fedora-packages/master/mmg3d/mmg3d.spec SRPM URL: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4532412/RPMS/mmg3d4-4.0.0-2.fc19.src.rpm Description: Anisotropic Tetrahedral Remesher / Moving Mesh Generator. Anisotropic mesh adaptation methods are used to control the accuracy of numerical solution while simultaneously reducing the number of mesh vertices to a minimum. Fedora Account System Username: anganar Hi folks, I'm working on Gmsh package (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753577). I'm packaging libraries now that were bundled with gmsh. mmg3d4 package is a part of this work. This is my first package, so I need a sponsor.
As an early hint, point the fedora-review tool at this ticket: fedora-review -b 1065541 It doesn't perform a full or bullet-proof review, but checks many things. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Package_Maintainers
Hi Alexey, are you still pursuing this? I'm packaging code_aster, and hence need this. I've updated the spec for the latest version 4.0.1 and also did some cleanup. Result is here: Spec URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/mmg3d.spec SRPM URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/mmg3d4-4.0.1-1.fc21.src.rpm If you aren't pursuing this anymore, I'm happy to take over. Thanks
-> with correct SRPM name Spec URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/mmg3d.spec SRPM URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/mmg3d-4.0.1-1.fc21.src.rpm
Alexey and I discussed about packaging gmsh. I never got around to taking care of few other bits of gmsh - one of the parts is this package. Since I am not a packager sponsor, it would be a bit pointless(?) if I review Alexey's submission. Sandro, I can review this package if you take it up.
gmsh is exactly what I'm looking at, one of the last big missing pieces for code_aster. I've now got all dependencies packages together and am about to see whether gmsh actually compiles... In any case, I guess I'll take it up since the review looks stalled. Alexey, I hope you don't mind.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1109444 ***
> In any case, I guess I'll take it up since the > review looks stalled. Alexey, I hope you don't mind. Ok. Since nobody volunteered to sponsor for 4 month, it was really stalled.
Alexey: I'm not a sponsor myself, but I'm going to post a few more package reviews shortly. You can do informal reviews of those, and along with the packages you already did yourself, I'm sure that we can convince a sponsor to sponsor you. Would that be a plan?
> [skip] > Would that be a plan? Ok. I have some spare time now, so I can do informal reviews.
Ok, here are two review requests (both gmsh dependencies) alglib - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109490 liblbfgs - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109491 You can also do a self-review of your voro++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065542 And then I guess, together with the good packaging you already did, it should be enough to convince a sponsor.