Bug 1067454 - A problem with ABRT
Summary: A problem with ABRT
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gnome-abrt
Version: 20
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jakub Filak
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:5baf8666fb5a2f2d0a8e7f5950d...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-02-20 13:42 UTC by David Poulsen
Modified: 2016-12-01 00:46 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-06-03 08:16:23 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: Screenshot from 2014-02-20 14:42:33.png (45.21 KB, application/octet-stream)
2014-02-20 13:43 UTC, David Poulsen
no flags Details

Description David Poulsen 2014-02-20 13:42:59 UTC
Description of problem:
While trying to install Skype 64 bit and Chrome 64 bit downloads from their homepages with YUM Extender:

A kernel problem occurred, but your kernel has been tainted (flags:GW). Kernel maintainers are unable to diagnose tainted reports.

I use Fedora 20 Cinnamon.

Version-Release number of selected component:
gnome-abrt-0.3.5

Additional info:
reporter:       libreport-2.1.12
kernel:         3.13.3-201.fc20.x86_64
type:           libreport

Comment 1 David Poulsen 2014-02-20 13:43:02 UTC
Created attachment 865527 [details]
File: Screenshot from 2014-02-20 14:42:33.png

Comment 2 Jakub Filak 2014-11-11 10:01:16 UTC
Thank you for the report.

Unfortunately, this is the correct behaviour. Visit the followin URL for more details:
http://abrt.readthedocs.org/en/latest/faq.html#what-is-tainted-kernel-and-why-is-my-kernel-tainted

Was that tainted kernel oops the only oops ABRT detected? If so, I think this report is a dupe bug #1045900.

Comment 3 Fedora End Of Life 2015-05-29 10:59:38 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 20. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora  'version'
of '20'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora 20 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora 
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 4 Jakub Filak 2015-06-03 08:16:23 UTC
The information we've requested above is required in order to review this problem report further and diagnose or fix the issue if it is still present. Since it has been thirty days or more since we first requested additional information, we're assuming the problem is either no longer present in the current Fedora release, or that there is no longer any interest in tracking the problem. 

Setting status to "CLOSED: INSUFFICIENT_DATA". If you still experience this problem after updating to our latest Fedora release and can provide the information previously requested, please feel free to reopen the bug report.

Comment 5 David Poulsen 2015-08-24 11:25:09 UTC
The update did fix the problem. Thank you very much.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.