Bug 1069871 (akka-review) - Review Request: akka - JVM actor toolkit
Summary: Review Request: akka - JVM actor toolkit
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: akka-review
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Robert Rati
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: typesafe-config-review scala-stm-review 1069495
Blocks: bigdata-review 1071495
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-02-25 20:06 UTC by Will Benton
Modified: 2023-09-14 02:04 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-08-10 13:21:41 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
rrati: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Will Benton 2014-02-25 20:06:04 UTC
Spec URL: http://freevariable.com/akka/akka.spec
SRPM URL: http://freevariable.com/akka/akka-2.3.0-0.1.RC2.fc19.src.rpm
Description:  toolkit and runtime for building highly concurrent, distributed, and fault tolerant event-driven applications on the JVM
Fedora Account System Username: willb

Note that this package only includes three jars — akka-actor, akka-remote, and akka-slf4j — for now.

Comment 1 gil cattaneo 2014-03-04 13:35:24 UTC
hi
is available akka v2.3.0-RC4
please, change 
Requires:      java
with
Requires:      java-headless

Comment 2 Robert Rati 2014-03-05 21:12:13 UTC
DEBUG util.py:281:  Error: No Package found for mvn(io.netty:netty)

Please update for the netty3 compat package or netty4.

Comment 3 Robert Rati 2014-03-06 13:39:45 UTC
Also, it appears the official release of 2.3.0 is out.  Please update to that version as well.

Comment 4 Will Benton 2014-03-10 13:21:32 UTC
The updated packages incorporate these fixes as well as some enhancements (mostly contributed by Gil):

Spec URL: http://freevariable.com/akka/akka.spec
SRPM URL: http://freevariable.com/akka/akka-2.3.0-1.fc21.src.rpm

Comment 5 Robert Rati 2014-03-11 17:59:55 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable


Issues:
=======
- Please add a comment re: tests being skipped in the spec

===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
     in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
     for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.

Please provide a comment as to why tests are not run.  Looks like missing
deps.

[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: akka-2.3.0-1.fc21.noarch.rpm
          akka-javadoc-2.3.0-1.fc21.noarch.rpm
          akka-2.3.0-1.fc21.src.rpm
akka.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Scalable -> Salable, Callable, Calculable
akka.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Scalable -> Salable, Callable, Calculable
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint akka akka-javadoc
akka.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Scalable -> Salable, Callable, Calculable
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'



Requires
--------
akka (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    java-headless
    javapackages-tools
    jpackage-utils
    mvn(com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java)
    mvn(com.typesafe:config)
    mvn(io.netty:netty:3)
    mvn(org.eclipse.osgi:org.eclipse.osgi)
    mvn(org.scala-lang:scala-library)
    mvn(org.scala-stm:scala-stm_2.10)
    mvn(org.slf4j:slf4j-api)
    mvn(org.uncommons.maths:uncommons-maths)

akka-javadoc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    jpackage-utils



Provides
--------
akka:
    akka
    mvn(com.typesafe.akka:akka-actor_2.10)
    mvn(com.typesafe.akka:akka-agent_2.10)
    mvn(com.typesafe.akka:akka-cluster_2.10)
    mvn(com.typesafe.akka:akka-dataflow_2.10)
    mvn(com.typesafe.akka:akka-kernel_2.10)
    mvn(com.typesafe.akka:akka-osgi_2.10)
    mvn(com.typesafe.akka:akka-remote_2.10)
    mvn(com.typesafe.akka:akka-slf4j_2.10)
    mvn(com.typesafe.akka:akka-transactor_2.10)

akka-javadoc:
    akka-javadoc



Source checksums
----------------
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/typesafe/akka/akka-transactor_2.10/2.3.0/akka-transactor_2.10-2.3.0.pom :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : af5a69249fb5da260165b9c494aaecf61ae36830be2edb0fcd6d109c3ad07e6d
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : af5a69249fb5da260165b9c494aaecf61ae36830be2edb0fcd6d109c3ad07e6d
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/typesafe/akka/akka-actor_2.10/2.3.0/akka-actor_2.10-2.3.0.pom :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : f11249cf0d90b155fa18d848f32fce8cd9ca156c7ee941e32573c83ee8ade69d
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : f11249cf0d90b155fa18d848f32fce8cd9ca156c7ee941e32573c83ee8ade69d
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/typesafe/akka/akka-agent_2.10/2.3.0/akka-agent_2.10-2.3.0.pom :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 05cb82ca24690469e41f8f1d26ff13efc4b00ed63724664e9c2d248243da6255
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 05cb82ca24690469e41f8f1d26ff13efc4b00ed63724664e9c2d248243da6255
https://github.com/akka/akka/archive/v2.3.0.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : e051efe518ef9a067913b493168df8a2c86a978a461739f1698e5dd05f7e2430
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : e051efe518ef9a067913b493168df8a2c86a978a461739f1698e5dd05f7e2430
https://raw.github.com/willb/rpm-packaging/85bb1497a483faef89749cd4704b04a23bf32e5d/akka-packaging/akka-build.xml :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : b9ca2add3f34e554684bbbdda2ff4713d55f7180b9e08045174b7917d8641999
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : b9ca2add3f34e554684bbbdda2ff4713d55f7180b9e08045174b7917d8641999
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/typesafe/akka/akka-kernel_2.10/2.3.0/akka-kernel_2.10-2.3.0.pom :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 38235e97e8eb8705f47d9beefd06e9a89e0b6670c320616cc19c7cca0eafcd0d
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 38235e97e8eb8705f47d9beefd06e9a89e0b6670c320616cc19c7cca0eafcd0d
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/typesafe/akka/akka-osgi_2.10/2.3.0/akka-osgi_2.10-2.3.0.pom :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 7bec8213c47adebd7cdbbe58b797cfc83aad8a870f53b6123448149ac0e61c59
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 7bec8213c47adebd7cdbbe58b797cfc83aad8a870f53b6123448149ac0e61c59
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/typesafe/akka/akka-cluster_2.10/2.3.0/akka-cluster_2.10-2.3.0.pom :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 47e42495aea79442da48d8f61357df0b83e175eb662314c30a1234b10138a77a
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 47e42495aea79442da48d8f61357df0b83e175eb662314c30a1234b10138a77a
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/typesafe/akka/akka-dataflow_2.10/2.3.0/akka-dataflow_2.10-2.3.0.pom :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 7cac1fdcf02ca9b5f0d346311f2f509d241cd5fccd6f7fad06262723492a3017
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 7cac1fdcf02ca9b5f0d346311f2f509d241cd5fccd6f7fad06262723492a3017
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/typesafe/akka/akka-remote_2.10/2.3.0/akka-remote_2.10-2.3.0.pom :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 302a66241f3073592f26c85b212056469c5c1de6507e507ebd2ac451b7d727c9
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 302a66241f3073592f26c85b212056469c5c1de6507e507ebd2ac451b7d727c9
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/typesafe/akka/akka-slf4j_2.10/2.3.0/akka-slf4j_2.10-2.3.0.pom :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 2a74e816154045bf446ba99df96bee3553146d63595cae05d3393f70e7881b4b
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 2a74e816154045bf446ba99df96bee3553146d63595cae05d3393f70e7881b4b


APPROVED

Comment 6 Will Benton 2014-03-11 19:00:21 UTC
Thanks, Rob!

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: akka
Short Description: JVM actor toolkit 
Owners: willb
Branches: f20
InitialCC: java-sig

Comment 7 Gwyn Ciesla 2014-03-12 12:07:50 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2014-03-12 18:29:39 UTC
akka-2.3.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/akka-2.3.0-1.fc20

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2014-03-15 15:16:05 UTC
akka-2.3.0-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository.

Comment 10 gil cattaneo 2015-02-12 19:13:36 UTC
Please. can you push on stable or close this bug...?

Comment 11 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-14 02:04:15 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.