Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 1070106 - [GSS] (6.4.0) Generic JMS adapter does not deploy correctly in domain mode.
[GSS] (6.4.0) Generic JMS adapter does not deploy correctly in domain mode.
Status: VERIFIED
Product: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6
Classification: JBoss
Component: JMS (Show other bugs)
6.3.0
Unspecified Unspecified
unspecified Severity unspecified
: DR9
: EAP 6.4.0
Assigned To: Tom Ross
Miroslav Novak
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2014-02-26 04:12 EST by Tom Ross
Modified: 2018-02-15 09:29 EST (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
In the previous version of JBoss EAP 6, contextual information was not correctly checked during the add operation. As a result, generic JMS adapter was deployed correctly in domain mode. This issue is now fixed in the current version of JBoss EAP 6. Generic JMS adapter can now be deployed in domain mode.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
JBoss Issue Tracker WFLY-2912 Major Resolved Generic JMS adapter does not deploy correctly in domain mode. 2017-06-08 02:36 EDT

  None (edit)
Description Tom Ross 2014-02-26 04:12:36 EST
Description of problem:
Generic JMS adapter does not deploy correctly in domain mode.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
JBoss EAP 6.2.0

How reproducible:
Try to deploy generic RA adaptor in domain mode.


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 JBoss JIRA Server 2014-04-09 06:34:19 EDT
Stefano Maestri <smaestri@redhat.com> updated the status of jira WFLY-2912 to Reopened
Comment 3 Tom Ross 2014-11-03 10:19:47 EST
Looks like they got one-ff patch for this issue.
Comment 4 Ondřej Kalman 2014-11-14 09:22:04 EST
VERIFIED with 6.4.0.DR9

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.