Bug 1071921 - [QE] (EAP-6.2.2) RPM: Same release of jbossweb package appeared in two errata
Summary: [QE] (EAP-6.2.2) RPM: Same release of jbossweb package appeared in two errata
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6
Classification: JBoss
Component: RPMs
Version: 6.2.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
urgent
Target Milestone: CR3
: EAP 6.2.2
Assignee: Fernando Nasser
QA Contact: Katerina Odabasi
Russell Dickenson
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: eap62-cp02-blockers
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-03-03 13:06 UTC by Katerina Odabasi
Modified: 2018-07-02 14:10 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-06-02 12:49:54 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1075481 0 unspecified CLOSED [QE] (EAP-6.2.2) RPM: jbossweb package wrong set up of package in errata 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC

Internal Links: 1075481

Description Katerina Odabasi 2014-03-03 13:06:18 UTC 
Errata 2014:17095 (which is not yet processed) contains packages

jbossweb-7.3.0-2.Final_redhat_2.1.ep6.el5
and
jbossweb-7.3.0-2.Final_redhat_2.1.ep6.el6

the same packages apppears in errata 2014:17005 (and 2014:17004 respectively) for CP release.

1) Packages included in 2014:17095 should not be again a part of CP release.
2) 2014:17095 which contains CVE bugfix should be shipped before CP release. Therefore 17005 and 17004 needs to have set up dependency on 17095.
Comment 2 Fernando Nasser 2014-03-03 15:50:21 UTC 
Removed jbossweb from 6.2.2 errata, going out before that on an async one.
Comment 3 Pavel Janousek 2014-03-04 12:31:05 UTC 
Well, jbossweb is removed from CP02 Errata (for both RHELs).

But CP02 Errata (for both RHELs) don't have defined the dependency to Errata yet (Errata which ships jbossweb as CVE). This dependency must be defined before passing Errata (both) to QE. It is blocker for us.
Comment 4 Fernando Nasser 2014-03-04 13:40:26 UTC 
Hi Chris,

Is it possible to define a dependency between errata?  How can that be done?
Comment 5 Fernando Nasser 2014-03-04 21:59:12 UTC 
Thanks to Chris O'Brien for his help with the setup.
Comment 6 Fernando Nasser 2014-03-04 22:00:23 UTC 
Now both 17005 and 17004 depend on 17095
Comment 7 Katerina Odabasi 2014-03-25 14:34:47 UTC 
Verified in 6.2.2.CP.CR3.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.