Description of problem: See summary. This did not happen in 3.3 because there was a downstream-only patch to change the package name for which we check for updates. For 3.4 we want to make this cleaner.
The merged patch is incomplete: it takes care of the package name but it's missing package group name.
Hi Zac, Just out of curiosity. Why should we document a bug introduced at pre-release? Bugs that were not released into customers are part of release implementation, and are not exposed to users. Thanks,
Moving back to post - still more fixes needed for version lock stuff to use the new env.
Successfully updated to av5 using rhevm-setup-3.4.0-0.12.beta2.el6ev.noarch without any issues.
(In reply to Alon Bar-Lev from comment #2) > Hi Zac, > > Just out of curiosity. > > Why should we document a bug introduced at pre-release? Bugs that were not > released into customers are part of release implementation, and are not > exposed to users. > > Thanks, Alon, This was one in a list of bugs that had docs text included. My pass through was an act of curation meant to clean up provided docs text. I'll ping Chris Pelland and ask her if we need to document this one. Zac
Chris, Does this one need a release note? Thanks in advance. Zac
Closing as part of 3.4.0