https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Treatment_Of_Bundled_Libraries love appears to bundle Box2D, enet, and luasocket which are available as separate packages in Fedora.
Understood, I'll take a look into this when I have some time
Sorry for the delay, I've been trying to fix this myself, but i'm having trouble patching it. Either way, I posted this bug upstream, as it seems like there's no option not to use the bundled libraries: https://bitbucket.org/rude/love/issue/870/allow-for-shared-version-of-libraries
If that's so, you'll need to get an exception from the FPC: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Exceptions ...and mark it properly in the specfile: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Requirement_if_you_bundle Regarding the upstream question "why", I suggest pointing them at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Why_no_Bundled_Libraries
Ticket created (sorry for the delay): https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/443
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle. Changing version to '22'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22
Added rational to spec on rawhide, as accordance with the new bundling guidelines.