RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1078220 - SELinux port modifications lost
Summary: SELinux port modifications lost
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: preupgrade-assistant-contents
Version: 6.6
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Boris Ranto
QA Contact: Milos Malik
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1055996
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-03-19 12:27 UTC by Ondřej Pták
Modified: 2014-10-14 10:19 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1099061 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-10-14 10:19:05 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2014:1627 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE preupgrade-assistant-contents bug fix and enhancement update 2014-10-14 14:18:37 UTC

Description Ondřej Pták 2014-03-19 12:27:45 UTC
Description of problem:
I enabled few more ports for apache, but after upgrade 6->7 these rules are lost.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. semanage port -a -t http_port_t -p tcp 8888
2. inplace upgrade
3. semanage port -l | grep http_port_t

Actual results:
http_port_t   tcp      80, 81, 443, 488, 8008, 8009, 8443, 9000


Expected results:
http_port_t   tcp      80, 81, 443, 488, 8008, 8009, 8443, 8888, 9000

Comment 4 Milos Malik 2014-05-19 11:38:53 UTC
After the in-place upgrade there is a discrepancy between SELinux tools:

# semanage port -l -C
SELinux Port Type              Proto    Port Number

http_port_t                    tcp      8888
# seinfo --portcon=8888
	portcon tcp 1024-32767 system_u:object_r:unreserved_port_t:s0
	portcon udp 1024-32767 system_u:object_r:unreserved_port_t:s0
#

Comment 5 Miroslav Grepl 2014-05-20 10:31:00 UTC
We could use

"semanage export"

to output local customizations.


# semanage export
boolean -D
login -D
interface -D
user -D
port -D
node -D
fcontext -D
module -D
boolean -m -1 httpd_verify_dns
login -a -s unconfined_u -r 's0-s0:c0.c1023' __default__
login -a -s unconfined_u -r 's0-s0:c0.c1023' root
login -a -s system_u -r 's0-s0:c0.c1023' system_u
port -a -t http_port_t -p tcp 8888

Comment 6 Miroslav Grepl 2014-05-20 10:54:47 UTC
We want to use 

"semanage -o [output_file|-]"

in RHEL6.

Comment 7 Tomas Tomecek 2014-05-30 11:33:38 UTC
We already have a content which tracks this:

SELinux > RestoreConfig

It was written by Boris Ranto, so I reassigned.

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2014-10-14 10:19:05 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1627.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.