Created attachment 877774 [details] The link on bug point to this file, An intro to Gluster Architecture Description of problem: While learning about Gluster I came across this link: https://www.google.co.il/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CDsQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fmoo.nac.uci.edu%2F~hjm%2Ffs%2FAn_Introduction_To_Gluster_ArchitectureV7_110708.pdf&ei=6sUuU_WcKKyw7AbRjYEQ&usg=AFQjCNHjQGYWmKZm0dV9afGKmEPtK4mELQ&sig2=cqRC3BAApqEcLaKTGmfAIg&bvm=bv.62922401,d.ZGU PDF titled: Cloud storage for the Modern Data Center, An Introduction to Gluster Architecture versions 3.1.X On page 6: "Note by the time a solution has approximately 10 drives, the performance bottleneck has generally already moved to the network." I think "10 drives" was supposed to be "10 servers", I may be wrong but this sounds more logical and correct, when mentioning network bottleneck. Not sure if it's still relevant as i didn't find this link on RH or Gluster site. But it looks like a formal document from Gluster.com. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 3.1. How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
Hi Vijay, Could you help us to resolve this issue? Regards, Anjana
Yes, 10 servers is more appropriate.
As per my discussions with Vijay, moving this bug to the community queue.
Divya, can you make this correction in the community documentation, or point us to the sources for the PDF? Thanks, Niels
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days