From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703 Epiphany/1.0.4 Description of problem: Was not sure how to file this one, but since it happened when running up2date :-). This box is a fedora 0.95 subsribed to rawhide. Their are many packages that up2date says many packages have no GPG signature. Too many to list ;-) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): up2date-4.1.7-1 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Start up2date on Fedora 0.95 2. up2date says packaged not signed with GPG 3. Actual Results: up2date says packaged not signed with GPG Expected Results: packages should be signed with GPG key Additional info: IP of server was 66.187.232.30. Reverse record shows as ftp.redhat.com.
According to traffic on fedora-test-list, many rawhide packages don't have a signature. This is the state of things -- GPG signatures are added manually, but the rawhide push process is semi-automatic. Not sure if this should be a big deal or not. Suggest this be closed as NOTABUG.
[root@cr1itl130 root]# up2date --nosig Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/rhn/up2date_client/gui.py", line 2070, in doInstallation kernelsToInstall = up2date.installPackages(self.selectedPkgList, self.rpmCallback) File "/usr/share/rhn/up2date_client/up2date.py", line 604, in installPackages hdr = getRealHeader(pkg) File "/usr/share/rhn/up2date_client/up2date.py", line 173, in getRealHeader hdr = _ts.hdrFromFdno(fd) rpm.error: public key not trusted up2date-4.1.12-1 rpm-4.2.1-0.30 Should I open a new one about this? It is in the neighborhood.
rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 5896 Oct 29 14:52 anaconda-help-9.2-1.noarch.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 5896 Oct 29 14:52 redhat-config-network-1.3.10-1.noarch.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 5896 Oct 29 14:52 redhat-config-network-tui-1.3.10-1.noarch.rpm I guess the rpms with 5896 bytes size are the bad ones :-)
kickstart.linux.ncsu.edu looks good, but yum channel rawhide from http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/rawhide/ is bad.
I take it back, I couldn NOT install the redhat-config-network (and tui) noarch rpms. This is what I get: # rpm -Uvh --nosignature redhat-config-network-1.3.10-1.noarch.rpm error: open of <!DOCTYPE failed: No such file or directory error: open of HTML failed: No such file or directory error: open of PUBLIC failed: No such file or directory
oops, wrong bug, disregard if you want :)
And the packages of the day for 10/30/03 are indexhtml-1-1.noarch.rpm anaconda-images-9.2-3.noarch.rpm Hmm, maybe md5sum on the rpms after putting them on the server would be a good idea :-)
server should be fixed now. I hope. And current clients should be somewhat more robust in face of this (though, they still basically just stop, since the info they need isnt there, but they stop nicely)