RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1080591 - pcs.8: .TP macro issue
Summary: pcs.8: .TP macro issue
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: pcs
Version: 7.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Tomas Jelinek
QA Contact: Cluster QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-03-25 17:47 UTC by Jan Pokorný [poki]
Modified: 2015-03-05 09:19 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: pcs-0.9.126-1.el7
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Cause: improper usage of .TP macro on some places Consequence: confusing line break and indentation on those places Fix: use .TP macro properly Result: manpage displayed correctly
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-03-05 09:19:08 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
proposed fix (28.10 KB, patch)
2014-05-26 12:16 UTC, Tomas Jelinek 		no flags Details | Diff
View All


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:0415 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE pcs bug fix and enhancement update 2015-03-05 14:16:41 UTC

Description Jan Pokorný [poki] 2014-03-25 17:47:44 UTC 
Currently the man page does not use .TP macro properly in some cases,
resulting in some confusion especially in case of more convoluted
subcommand syntax.

For instance:

>        colocation set <resource1>  <resource2>  [resourceN]...  [setop‐
>        tions] ...
>               [set    <resourceX>    <resourceY>    ...]    [setoptions
>               <name>=<value>...] Create a colocation constraint with  a
>               resource set

which is caused by intended label being split on multiple lines; when
corrected:

>        colocation set <resource1>  <resource2>  [resourceN]...  [setop‐
>        tions]   ...   [set  <resourceX>  <resourceY>  ...]  [setoptions
>        <name>=<value>...]
>               Create a colocation constraint with a resource set
Comment 2 Tomas Jelinek 2014-05-26 12:16:00 UTC 
Created attachment 899291 [details]
proposed fix
Comment 3 Tomas Jelinek 2014-05-26 12:17:12 UTC 
test:
Display pcs manpage. Check that description of the commands is formatted like this:

command parameter parameter
       command description

or

cmnd   command description

instead of this:

command parameter
       parameter command description
Comment 4 Tomas Jelinek 2014-09-11 08:33:02 UTC 
Before Fix:
[root@rh70-node1 ~]# rpm -q pcs
pcs-0.9.115-32.el7.x86_64
[root@rh70-node1 ~]# man pcs
{output trimmed}
       colocation set <resource1> <resource2> [resourceN]... [setoptions] ...
              [set <resourceX> <resourceY> ...] [setoptions <name>=<value>...]
              Create a colocation constraint with a resource set
{output trimmed}

After Fix:
[root@rh70-node1 ~]# rpm -q pcs
pcs-0.9.126-1.el7.x86_64
[root@rh70-node1 ~]# man pcs
{output trimmed}
       colocation  set  <resource1>  <resource2> [resourceN]... [options] [set
       <resourceX>    <resourceY>    ...    [options]]    [setoptions    [con‐
       straint_options]]
              Create  a  colocation  constraint with a resource set. Available
{output trimmed}
Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2015-03-05 09:19:08 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0415.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.