Bug 1081493 - [abrt] evolution: evolution killed by SIGSEGV
Summary: [abrt] evolution: evolution killed by SIGSEGV
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: evolution
Version: 20
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Matthew Barnes
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf...
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:d776ab465584f7e1533818791f9...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-03-27 12:53 UTC by Pavel Mlčoch
Modified: 2014-03-29 17:40 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-03-29 17:40:01 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (85.14 KB, text/plain)
2014-03-27 12:53 UTC, Pavel Mlčoch
no flags Details
File: cgroup (172 bytes, text/plain)
2014-03-27 12:53 UTC, Pavel Mlčoch
no flags Details
File: core_backtrace (64.39 KB, text/plain)
2014-03-27 12:54 UTC, Pavel Mlčoch
no flags Details
File: dso_list (28.88 KB, text/plain)
2014-03-27 12:54 UTC, Pavel Mlčoch
no flags Details
File: environ (1.32 KB, text/plain)
2014-03-27 12:54 UTC, Pavel Mlčoch
no flags Details
File: exploitable (81 bytes, text/plain)
2014-03-27 12:54 UTC, Pavel Mlčoch
no flags Details
File: limits (1.29 KB, text/plain)
2014-03-27 12:54 UTC, Pavel Mlčoch
no flags Details
File: maps (134.45 KB, text/plain)
2014-03-27 12:54 UTC, Pavel Mlčoch
no flags Details
File: open_fds (3.12 KB, text/plain)
2014-03-27 12:54 UTC, Pavel Mlčoch
no flags Details
File: proc_pid_status (942 bytes, text/plain)
2014-03-27 12:54 UTC, Pavel Mlčoch
no flags Details
File: var_log_messages (2.28 KB, text/plain)
2014-03-27 12:54 UTC, Pavel Mlčoch
no flags Details

Description Pavel Mlčoch 2014-03-27 12:53:48 UTC
Version-Release number of selected component:
evolution-3.10.4-2.fc20

Additional info:
reporter:       libreport-2.2.0
backtrace_rating: 3
cmdline:        evolution
executable:     /usr/bin/evolution
kernel:         3.13.6-200.fc20.x86_64
runlevel:       N 5
type:           CCpp
uid:            1000

Truncated backtrace:
Thread no. 1 (5 frames)
 #0 ??
 #7 gtk_dialog_run at gtkdialog.c:1075
 #8 mailto_handler_prompt at evolution-mailto-handler.c:171
 #9 mailto_handler_check at evolution-mailto-handler.c:204
 #14 e_shell_event at e-shell.c:1714

Potential duplicate: bug 866207

Comment 1 Pavel Mlčoch 2014-03-27 12:53:54 UTC
Created attachment 879450 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Pavel Mlčoch 2014-03-27 12:53:57 UTC
Created attachment 879451 [details]
File: cgroup

Comment 3 Pavel Mlčoch 2014-03-27 12:54:03 UTC
Created attachment 879452 [details]
File: core_backtrace

Comment 4 Pavel Mlčoch 2014-03-27 12:54:07 UTC
Created attachment 879453 [details]
File: dso_list

Comment 5 Pavel Mlčoch 2014-03-27 12:54:09 UTC
Created attachment 879454 [details]
File: environ

Comment 6 Pavel Mlčoch 2014-03-27 12:54:11 UTC
Created attachment 879455 [details]
File: exploitable

Comment 7 Pavel Mlčoch 2014-03-27 12:54:14 UTC
Created attachment 879456 [details]
File: limits

Comment 8 Pavel Mlčoch 2014-03-27 12:54:19 UTC
Created attachment 879457 [details]
File: maps

Comment 9 Pavel Mlčoch 2014-03-27 12:54:22 UTC
Created attachment 879458 [details]
File: open_fds

Comment 10 Pavel Mlčoch 2014-03-27 12:54:24 UTC
Created attachment 879459 [details]
File: proc_pid_status

Comment 11 Pavel Mlčoch 2014-03-27 12:54:26 UTC
Created attachment 879460 [details]
File: var_log_messages

Comment 12 Milan Crha 2014-03-27 17:54:41 UTC
Thanks for a bug report. I think this happened due to a memory corruption (like if some part of the code writes to an already freed memory, or any other kind of a similar issue), which exhibits this way. I see from the logs that you updated evolution packages just before the crash. Maybe that's the reason, part of the libraries were "remembered" by the system from the previous version and other part was used from the new version.

Does it help, if you restart the whole machine, which will make sure that only the updated binaries are used?

Comment 13 Pavel Mlčoch 2014-03-29 17:39:26 UTC
After restart It seems to be fine.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.