Bug 10860 - Probable remote buffer overflow in telnetd < 0.16
Summary: Probable remote buffer overflow in telnetd < 0.16
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 50335
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: telnet
Version: 6.1
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Harald Hoyer
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2000-04-16 16:29 UTC by Pekka Savola
Modified: 2008-05-01 15:37 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2001-07-31 15:56:24 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Pekka Savola 2000-04-16 16:29:06 UTC
http://linuxtoday.com/stories/20245.html is Caldera Systems' security
advisory about telnetd buffer overflow that is causing grief in pre-0.16
netkit-based builds.  Massive buffer cleanup mentioned in netkit-telnet's
changelog would also hint at this.

Caldera seems to use same base files, so if we can assume the problem is
real there, it's most probably real in here too.  I checked the srpm files
you're using and there is no mention of this, nor patches.

Thus, I fear all builds up to 6.1 are affected.

Comment 1 Pekka Savola 2001-07-24 05:51:35 UTC
Escalating; this _must_ be fixed now:

Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 22:15:10 +0200
From: Sebastian <scut.de>
To: bugtraq
Subject: multiple vendor telnet daemon vulnerability

Systems Affected
===================

    System                                  | vulnerable   | exploitable *
    ----------------------------------------+--------------+------------------
    BSDI 4.x default                        |      yes     |       yes
    FreeBSD [2345].x default                |      yes     |       yes
    IRIX 6.5                                |      yes     |        no
    Linux netkit-telnetd < 0.14             |      yes     |        ?
    Linux netkit-telnetd >= 0.14            |       no     |
    NetBSD 1.x default                      |      yes     |       yes
    OpenBSD 2.x                             |      yes     |        ?
    OpenBSD current                         |       no     |
    Solaris 2.x sparc                       |      yes     |        ?
    <almost any other vendor's telnetd>     |      yes     |        ?
    ----------------------------------------+--------------+------------------

    * = From our analysis and conclusions, which may not be correct or we may
        have overseen things. Do not rely on this.


Comment 2 Harald Hoyer 2001-08-01 06:42:16 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 50335 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.