Description of problem: httpd 2.0.48 was released to fix 2 security vulnerabilities. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): httpd-2.0.47-10 Actual results: There are 2 patches to re-enable and one patch can be removed. Expected results: Update to 2.0.48, re-enable the patches and remove one patch. And may you write in httpd-2.0.36-redhat.patch "Fedora Linux" instead of "Fedora"..."Fedora Linux" looks better ;-) Additional info: Patch 25: Can be removed, because it's already in httpd 2.0.48 Patch 34: Has to re-enable (attached httpd-2.0.48-sslio.patch) Patch 40: Has to re-enable (attached httpd-2.0.48-cnfdir.patch) In the httpd.spec, at "# Remove unpackaged files" has to be added the line: $PPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/httpd/build/config.nice or rpmbuild doesn't create rpms... The patches were adapted after best knowledge and conscience. httpd 2.0.48 with my re-enabled patches is working fine, here.
Created attachment 95605 [details] Re-enabled cnfdir patch for 2.0.48
Created attachment 95606 [details] Re-enabled sslio patch for 2.0.48
Oh sorry, one mistake: --- snipp --- %files devel [...] %{_libdir}/httpd/build/config.nice --- snapp --- instead of: > In the httpd.spec, at "# Remove unpackaged files" has to be added the line: > $PPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/httpd/build/config.nice > or rpmbuild doesn't create rpms...
*** Bug 108584 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Thanks Robert. I have update packages ready for testing at: http://people.redhat.com/jorton/FedoraC1-httpd/ (yum-enabled) If anyone can try these out - please post any feedback here.
Oh nice...you fixed other things, too. May you can upload a source rpm, that I can test it at Red Hat 9? Sorry, I only have Red Hat 9 at my productive systems.
Sure, done.
I only can say, it works very well here on my systems...
Updated -1.2 packages are the current test version: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/testing/1/i386/
The update to httpd-2.0.48-1.2 has now been issued.