Bug 1086499
| Summary: | User can access unauthorized repositories via [Administration] even after configuring roles | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] JBoss BRMS Platform 6 | Reporter: | Toshiya Kobayashi <tkobayas> | ||||
| Component: | Business Central | Assignee: | manstis | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Tomas Livora <tlivora> | ||||
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||
| Version: | 6.0.1 | CC: | kverlaen, lpetrovi, tkobayas, wsiqueir | ||||
| Target Milestone: | ER2 | Keywords: | Reopened | ||||
| Target Release: | 6.0.2 | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2015-06-18 05:18:45 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Toshiya Kobayashi
2014-04-11 02:46:44 UTC
Created attachment 885217 [details]
user1_can_access_repo2_in_Administration.png
Interesting :) The intent is that the "Administration" perspective should not be available to Users who do not have the "admin" role. If they have the "admin" role then it is acceptable that within the "Administration" perspective they can perform all functions and view all repositories. Therefore, my opinion is that we are not correctly protecting access to the "Administration" perspective. This is however different to the subject of the BZ. Can you please confirm correcting access to "Administration" should be corrected in lieu of preventing access to repositories as you have requested? Thanks. Thanks Mike, that perfectly makes sense. Please protect "Administration" then it would be fine for this BZ. Verified on BRMS 6.0.2 ER2 Hi, I am still able to see this issue on BPM Suite 6.1. Can we have this fixed on BPM Suite 6.1.2? (I will create the required BZ) Thanks. The issue I am facing is slightly different. I will open a new BZ. Sorry the spam. (Thanks Toshiya) |