Bug 1087379 - Review Request: perl-Thread-SigMask - Thread specific signal masks
Summary: Review Request: perl-Thread-SigMask - Thread specific signal masks
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David Shea
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1087401
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-04-14 09:38 UTC by Ralf Corsepius
Modified: 2014-05-17 06:31 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: perl-Thread-SigMask-0.004-1.fc19
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-05-17 06:30:57 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
dshea: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ralf Corsepius 2014-04-14 09:38:58 UTC
Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Thread-SigMask.spec
SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Thread-SigMask-0.004-1.fc21.src.rpm
Description: 
This module provides per-thread signal masks. On non-threaded perls it will
be effectively the same as POSIX::sigprocmask. The interface works exactly
the same as sigprocmask.

Fedora Account System Username: corsepiu

Comment 1 David Shea 2014-05-06 14:04:22 UTC
Looks good. The rpmlint warnings about spelling are obviously worthless, and everything else is copacetic.

Here comes some text:

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
     Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
     attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
     "Unknown or generated". 2 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
     licensecheck in /home/dshea/1087379-perl-Thread-SigMask/licensecheck.txt
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must
     be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
     in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
     for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Perl:
[x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires:.
[x]: CPAN urls should be non-versioned.

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
     arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: perl-Thread-SigMask-0.004-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
          perl-Thread-SigMask-0.004-1.fc21.src.rpm
perl-Thread-SigMask.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US perls -> Perls, peels, perks
perl-Thread-SigMask.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sigprocmask 
perl-Thread-SigMask.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US perls -> Perls, peels, perks
perl-Thread-SigMask.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sigprocmask 
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint perl-Thread-SigMask
perl-Thread-SigMask.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US perls -> Perls, peels, perks
perl-Thread-SigMask.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sigprocmask 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'



Requires
--------
perl-Thread-SigMask (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libperl.so.5.18()(64bit)
    perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2)
    perl(Exporter)
    perl(XSLoader)
    perl(strict)
    perl(warnings)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)



Provides
--------
perl-Thread-SigMask:
    perl(Thread::SigMask)
    perl-Thread-SigMask
    perl-Thread-SigMask(x86-64)



Unversioned so-files
--------------------
perl-Thread-SigMask: /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Thread/SigMask/SigMask.so

Source checksums
----------------
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/L/LE/LEONT/Thread-SigMask-0.004.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : f4baa4841b990b1fff742d3256dd1a91885603e3fdaf134337dd9dd13408113a
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : f4baa4841b990b1fff742d3256dd1a91885603e3fdaf134337dd9dd13408113a


Generated by fedora-review 0.5.1 (bb9bf27) last change: 2013-12-13
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1087379 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, Perl
Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG

Comment 2 Ralf Corsepius 2014-05-08 01:08:39 UTC
Thanks for the review, David.

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: perl-Thread-SigMask
Short Description: Thread specific signal masks
Owners: corsepiu
Branches: f19 f20
InitialCC: perl-sig

Comment 3 Gwyn Ciesla 2014-05-08 12:16:18 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2014-05-08 14:03:05 UTC
perl-Thread-SigMask-0.004-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Thread-SigMask-0.004-1.fc20

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2014-05-08 14:03:14 UTC
perl-Thread-SigMask-0.004-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Thread-SigMask-0.004-1.fc19

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2014-05-09 03:01:38 UTC
perl-Thread-SigMask-0.004-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2014-05-17 06:30:57 UTC
perl-Thread-SigMask-0.004-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2014-05-17 06:31:13 UTC
perl-Thread-SigMask-0.004-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.