Bug 108755 (Lam) - 2.4.22 nvnet failed on ifup...
Summary: 2.4.22 nvnet failed on ifup...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 78616
Alias: Lam
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: kernel
Version: 9
Hardware: athlon
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Arjan van de Ven
QA Contact: Brian Brock
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2003-11-01 01:52 UTC by Lam
Modified: 2007-04-18 16:59 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-02-21 18:59:36 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Lam 2003-11-01 01:52:06 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1) Opera 
7.21  [en]

Description of problem:
I've installed RedHat 9.0
I have a MSI K7N2G-L on which it has the latest nforce2 chipset, with 
onboard lan.

Installed Linux nforce v1.0-0261 to have my integrated lan to work.
Module nvnet.o compiled myself based on the kernel source for RH 9 
kernel 2.4.20-8
But IDE driver for the nforce2 won't allow me to have higher than 
udma2... Therefore, recompiled with new kernel 2.4.22 or even tried 
2.2.23-pre9

With the new kernel, I recompiled my nvnet codes but can't bring up..
. 

Anybody been able to load the module based on kernel 2.4.22?
Should I have to wait for nvidia to release a new source?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
nforce 1.0-0261

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.compile code on kernel 2.4.22
2.bring up the module: ifup eth0
3.If there was three... then I'd have access to the web! :)
    

Actual Results:  Can't bring it up... Failed...

Expected Results:  It should come up as it did with RH 9.0 kernel... 
2.4.20-8

Additional info:

Comment 1 Arjan van de Ven 2003-11-05 13:19:27 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 78616 ***

Comment 2 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-02-21 18:59:36 UTC
Changed to 'CLOSED' state since 'RESOLVED' has been deprecated.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.