Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-closure-compiler.spec SRPM URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-closure-compiler-0.2.5-1.fc20.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: tomh Description: A wrapper to the Google Closure compiler tool. It runs the jar file in a child process and returns the results in a callback.
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= [!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. I would explicitly do "Require: /usr/share/java/closure-compiler.jar". If the closure-compiler package moves the JAR to some other location, this package will silently fail. This is the approach I took with nodejs-require-cs package. [!]: Latest version is packaged. 0.2.6 released which also includes your pull request. ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 1 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/mockbuild/review/nodejs-closure- compiler/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Java: [x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [!]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). Rpmlint ------- Checking: nodejs-closure-compiler-0.2.5-1.fc21.noarch.rpm nodejs-closure-compiler-0.2.5-1.fc21.src.rpm nodejs-closure-compiler.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) js -> dis, ks, j nodejs-closure-compiler.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib nodejs-closure-compiler.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/closure-compiler/lib/vendor/compiler.jar /usr/share/java/closure-compiler.jar nodejs-closure-compiler.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) js -> dis, ks, j 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint nodejs-closure-compiler nodejs-closure-compiler.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) js -> dis, ks, j nodejs-closure-compiler.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib nodejs-closure-compiler.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/closure-compiler/lib/vendor/compiler.jar /usr/share/java/closure-compiler.jar 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- nodejs-closure-compiler (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): closure-compiler nodejs(engine) Provides -------- nodejs-closure-compiler: nodejs-closure-compiler npm(closure-compiler) Source checksums ---------------- http://registry.npmjs.org/closure-compiler/-/closure-compiler-0.2.5.tgz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 754f21ad854beec0cb4526626860e5dadf1ffbd86f57e7fcb52610fd6bd2c814 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 754f21ad854beec0cb4526626860e5dadf1ffbd86f57e7fcb52610fd6bd2c814 Generated by fedora-review 0.5.1 (bb9bf27) last change: 2013-12-13 Command line :/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -r -n ./nodejs-closure-compiler-0.2.5-1.fc20.src.rpm Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, Java Disabled plugins: C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG
Both fixed: Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-closure-compiler.spec SRPM URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-closure-compiler-0.2.6-1.fc20.src.rpm
Looks good. Package approved!
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: nodejs-closure-compiler Short Description: Bindings to Google's Closure Compiler for Node.js Owners: tomh jamielinux Branches: f19 f20 InitialCC:
(NB: I guess you listed f19 and f20 out of habit. closure-compiler is not yet available for those branches.)
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: nodejs-closure-compiler Short Description: Bindings to Google's Closure Compiler for Node.js Owners: tomh jamielinux Branches: InitialCC:
Git done (by process-git-requests).