Bug 109152 - redundant tables in database
Summary: redundant tables in database
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Other
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Peter Jones
QA Contact: Fanny Augustin
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 120995
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2003-11-05 01:42 UTC by Kim Dykeman
Modified: 2014-04-25 19:53 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version: rhn340sat
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-09-14 16:20:03 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Kim Dykeman 2003-11-05 01:42:39 UTC
check_suite_probe and check_suite_member_probes contain redundant
data.  This appears to be an artifact of the probe_schema refactor.

Apparently check_suite_probe was originally not a subclass of probe.
When check_suites was created as a subclass of probe and its data was
populated, check_suite_probe should have gone away.

Both classes are being used by the dynamo code (check_suite_probe more
heavily than check_suite_member_probe).

Comment 1 Karen Jacqmin-Adams 2004-05-18 16:29:54 UTC
#  How was this issue addressed?
Dropped table check_suite_member_probe and replaced references to it 
with check_suite_probe.

# What level of users are affected? 
Only the non-existent monitoring UI is impacted.

# Where specifically can the change be seen?
Database schema only

# If the change cannot be verified visually, how should it be tested?
1) sqlplus command: "desc check_suite_member_probe" should not be able
to find the table after the monitoring schema is deployed
2) monitoring schema should deploy check_suite_member_probe cleanly

Comment 2 Karen Jacqmin-Adams 2004-05-28 14:48:59 UTC
Transfering to Peter to mark as ON_DEV when he pushes the monitoring
schema to webdev.

Comment 3 Peter Jones 2004-05-31 21:58:01 UTC
on dev

Comment 4 Nick Hansen 2004-06-09 17:12:57 UTC
actually, #2 should read:
 2) monitoring schema should deploy check_suite_probe cleanly 

That being the case, this bug passes qa. 

Comment 5 Matt Jamison 2004-06-21 14:05:12 UTC
is there a test plan for this?

Comment 6 Matt Jamison 2004-06-22 15:56:00 UTC
ok, I obviously didn't read this thread carefully.

I now see the test plan thanks to the observant eyes of gdk.

Comment 7 Fanny Augustin 2004-06-24 15:17:35 UTC
Looks good in DB.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.