SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/rubygem-comp_tree.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/rubygem-comp_tree-1.1.3-1.el7.src.rpm Description: CompTree is a parallel computation tree structure based upon concepts from pure functional programming.
fails to build on F20 http://paste.fedoraproject.org/100419/32564139/
mock: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6842404 SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/rubygem-comp_tree.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/rubygem-comp_tree-1.1.3-2.el7.src.rpm * Mon May 12 2014 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak> - 1.1.3-2 - Fix test run
Issues: ======= - gems should require rubygems package Note: Requires: rubygems missing in rubygem-comp_tree-doc See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#RubyGems - hint - probably needed "%doc %{gem_docdir}" in doc package %files section - do not run tests by rake - there is 1 failing test TestREADMErdoc#test_README.rdoc_Synopsis: Errno::ENOMEM: Cannot allocate memory - /usr/bin/ruby /builddir/build/BUILD/comp_tree-1.1.3/devel/levitate.rb:652:in `popen' /builddir/build/BUILD/comp_tree-1.1.3/devel/levitate.rb:652:in `run_file_and_capture' /builddir/build/BUILD/comp_tree-1.1.3/devel/levitate.rb:736:in `block in run_doc_code' /usr/share/ruby/tempfile.rb:324:in `open' /builddir/build/BUILD/comp_tree-1.1.3/devel/levitate.rb:733:in `run_doc_code' /builddir/build/BUILD/comp_tree-1.1.3/devel/levitate.rb:760:in `block in run_doc_section' /builddir/build/BUILD/comp_tree-1.1.3/devel/levitate.rb:747:in `scan' /builddir/build/BUILD/comp_tree-1.1.3/devel/levitate.rb:747:in `run_doc_section' /builddir/build/BUILD/comp_tree-1.1.3/devel/levitate.rb:796:in `block (3 levels) in doc_to_test' 21 tests, 1110 assertions, 0 failures, 1 errors, 0 skips ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 19 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bredy/1092018-rubygem- comp_tree/licensecheck.txt [-]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gems, /usr/share/gems/doc [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Ruby: [x]: Platform dependent files must all go under %{gem_extdir_mri}, platform independent under %{gem_dir}. [x]: Gem package must not define a non-gem subpackage [x]: Macro %{gem_extdir} is deprecated. [x]: Gem package is named rubygem-%{gem_name} [x]: Package contains BuildRequires: rubygems-devel. [x]: Gem package must define %{gem_name} macro. [x]: Pure Ruby package must be built as noarch [x]: Package does not contain Requires: ruby(abi). [x]: Package contains Requires: ruby(release). ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [-]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. Ruby: [!]: Test suite should not be run by rake. [x]: Specfile should use macros from rubygem-devel package. Note: The specfile doesn't use these macros: %{gem_spec}, %exclude %{gem_cache}, %doc %{gem_docdir} [x]: Gem package should exclude cached Gem. [x]: Gem should use %gem_install macro. [x]: Test suite of the library should be run. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: rubygem-comp_tree-1.1.3-2.fc20.noarch.rpm rubygem-comp_tree-doc-1.1.3-2.fc20.noarch.rpm rubygem-comp_tree-1.1.3-2.fc20.src.rpm rubygem-comp_tree-doc.noarch: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint rubygem-comp_tree-doc rubygem-comp_tree rubygem-comp_tree-doc.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- rubygem-comp_tree-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): rubygem-comp_tree rubygem-comp_tree (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): ruby(release) rubygems Provides -------- rubygem-comp_tree-doc: rubygem-comp_tree-doc rubygem-comp_tree: rubygem(comp_tree) rubygem-comp_tree Source checksums ---------------- http://rubygems.org/downloads/comp_tree-1.1.3.gem : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : a9260f397f42e36de62764a8fe7e68bdbbcc75674d0419e831f633d6dda44936 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : a9260f397f42e36de62764a8fe7e68bdbbcc75674d0419e831f633d6dda44936 Generated by fedora-review 0.5.1 (bb9bf27) last change: 2013-12-13 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1092018 Buildroot used: fedora-20-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Ruby, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG
(In reply to Jan Pradac from comment #3) > Issues: > ======= > - gems should require rubygems package > Note: Requires: rubygems missing in rubygem-comp_tree-doc > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#RubyGems No. The main package already requires rubygems and the -doc subpackage depends on the main package, therefore it transitively drags in rubygems. No problem here. > - hint - probably needed "%doc %{gem_docdir}" in doc package %files section Nope. Packages that only contain documentation should not mark it %doc. If someone wishes to skip installing the documentation he can simply skip installing the package altogether, as there's nothing else there. > - do not run tests by rake > > - there is 1 failing test > TestREADMErdoc#test_README.rdoc_Synopsis: > Errno::ENOMEM: Cannot allocate memory - /usr/bin/ruby The tests succeeds in mock (see above "mock:" link). This is probably specific to your configuration -- either some rlimits, cgroups or lack of memory.
Thanks for explanation, for me this is sufficient for review.
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-comp_tree Short Description: A simple framework for automatic parallelism Owners: lkundrak Branches: f19 f20 el6 epel7
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Imported and built. Thank you!