Bug 1093191 - GFS2: xfstests 013: Entries is 15 - should be 14 for inode block 524057
Summary: GFS2: xfstests 013: Entries is 15 - should be 14 for inode block 524057
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1133395
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: kernel
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Steve Whitehouse
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-04-30 21:39 UTC by Andrew Price
Modified: 2014-11-17 13:24 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-11-17 13:24:00 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Test logs and metadata (2.34 MB, application/x-gzip)
2014-04-30 21:39 UTC, Andrew Price
no flags Details

Description Andrew Price 2014-04-30 21:39:44 UTC
Created attachment 891301 [details]
Test logs and metadata

Description of problem:

Well, I managed to get xfstests running in a virt rawhide cluster. Running test 013 ( fsstress.1 : -r) hit some corruption.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

3.15.0-0.rc3.git0.1.fc21.x86_64

How reproducible:

I've hit it in 2 out of 2 runs.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run xfstests test 013

Actual results:

_check_generic_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/mapper/vg_shared-lv_shared is inconsistent (see /var/lib/xfstests/results//generic/013.full)

The fsck -n output it gives includes:

Starting pass2
Entries is 15 - should be 14 for inode block 524057 (0x7ff19)

Expected results:

Test passes

Additional info:

This was run on a 3-node rawhide cluster. On the second run only one of the nodes was mounted.

Full xfstests, fsck -vvvn and fsck -vvvy logs and a metadata dump are in the attached tarball.

Comment 1 Robert Peterson 2014-09-16 15:37:12 UTC
This is probably a duplicate of bz#1133395.

Comment 2 Andrew Price 2014-11-17 13:24:00 UTC
(In reply to Robert Peterson from comment #1)
> This is probably a duplicate of bz#1133395.

I've had a chance to run xfstests on the upstream code and I can confirm that this was fixed, and is a duplicate of that bug.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1133395 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.