Spec URL: http://static.pierre.marijon.fr/rpm/libes/libes.spec SRPM URL: http://static.pierre.marijon.fr/rpm/libes/libes-0.5.2-0.1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Libes (Library Entity System), is an library for managing an entity system written in C++. For more info of Entity System Paradigme you can see http://entity-systems.wikidot.com/ . Fedora Account System Username: natir
*** Bug 1094056 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
It's my first package and i need a sponsor (yes i read too fast the wiki). * Upstream project page : https://github.com/jube/libes * Koji result http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6812591
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Contributor * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group * Please enter your full name in the bugzilla account preferences. * Consider running "fedora-review -b 1094057" to point that tool at this ticket for many helpful checks. > %package doc > Summary: Documentation files for %{name} > Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} Is that -doc subpackage really arch-specific? It contains HTML documentation. "BuildArch: noarch" sounds plausible. For reading the HTML documentation one does not need to install the base library package. Please don't add such a dependency to _independent_ -doc packages. If the documentation can only be displayed with a program in the base package, that would be an example of a case when to add such a dep. In case you added the dep only for the license and directories included in the base package, consider duplicating the license file and dirs in the -doc package instead. > %files > %{_libdir}/*.so > %dir %{_defaultdocdir}/es > %doc %{_defaultdocdir}/es/COPYING Uh, that's odd. If the package is named "libes", it ought to store doc files in a directory named "libes" not "es". Btw, in spec files you can use %_docdir just fine, and files below /usr/share/doc are marked as %doc implicitly (see "rpm -E %__docdir_path").
I follow your recommendation Spec URL: http://static.pierre.marijon.fr/rpm/libes/libes.spec.0.2 SRPM URL: http://static.pierre.marijon.fr/rpm/libes/libes-0.5.2-0.2.fc20.src.rpm fedora-review for 0.2 : http://static.pierre.marijon.fr/rpm/libes/review.txt.0.2 koji link : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6813416
> http://static.pierre.marijon.fr/rpm/libes/review.txt.0.2 The tool has found an issue with your package. ;-)
Ok upstream add patch for documentation installation. Spec URL: http://static.pierre.marijon.fr/rpm/libes/libes.spec SRPM URL: http://static.pierre.marijon.fr/rpm/libes/libes-0.5.3-0.1.fc20.src.rpm local fedora-review (i check all is ok) : http://static.pierre.marijon.fr/rpm/libes/review.txt.0.5.3-0.1 koji link : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6826185
Summary: Library for managing an entity system written in c++ C++ should be capitalized. I would expect Entity System to be capitalized too if it's a technical term %description If you do not know what an entity system is, you should read the following http://entity-systems.wikidot.com This doesn't look like a very good description for the package! The link describes it as "Component/Entity System" which is a better (less generic) name. Wikipedia uses Entity-component system: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entity_component_system
404 not found and several years without activity