Bug 1094625
| Summary: | [RFE] User should be able to see the Preview of errata when creating the filter with 'errata by date and type' | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | Sachin Ghai <sghai> |
| Component: | Errata Management | Assignee: | satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Katello QA List <katello-qa-list> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 6.0.3 | CC: | bbuckingham, bkearney, martinliu_cn, mjs, riehecky, sauchter, sghai, xdmoon |
| Target Milestone: | Unspecified | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Triaged |
| Target Release: | Unused | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-08-31 17:28:26 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Sachin Ghai
2014-05-06 07:31:52 UTC
Since this issue was entered in Red Hat Bugzilla, the release flag has been set to ? to ensure that it is properly evaluated for this release. When I run this scenario, I see the following: After the 'errata by date/type' filter is created, the user is returned to the Content->Filters list. Is this what you see? If so, this is the expected behavior for this filter type. If the user was instead creating an 'errata by id' filter, they do have the option of entering date/type information. This option allows the user to filter on the list of available errata to help them narrow their search for errata that they would like to explicitly add to the filter. If what you were hoping to see on the 'errata by date/type' filter is the ability to preview which errata will be included in the content view before it is publishe, that should be considered an RFE. We have discussed that in the future, it would be useful to have a preview; however, that is not currently supported. (In reply to Brad Buckingham from comment #3) > When I run this scenario, I see the following: > > After the 'errata by date/type' filter is created, the user is returned to > the Content->Filters list. Is this what you see? If so, this is the > expected behavior for this filter type. yes, this is what I'm getting now. > > If the user was instead creating an 'errata by id' filter, they do have the > option of entering date/type information. This option allows the user to > filter on the list of available errata to help them narrow their search for > errata that they would like to explicitly add to the filter. > > If what you were hoping to see on the 'errata by date/type' filter is the > ability to preview which errata will be included in the content view before > it is publishe, that should be considered an RFE. We have discussed that in > the future, it would be useful to have a preview; however, that is not > currently supported. yeah.. being a end-user, I would like to see the preview of filtered errata based on date.. thank you for clarifying it. I would change this to an RFE then. As per comment 3, UI should preview the errata which will be filtered when selecting the filter type 'errata by date/type'. thanks Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and we do not expect this to be implemented in product in the forseeable future. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this, please feel free to contact Rich Jerrido or Bryan Kearney. Thank you. |