Bug 1095728 - sporadic failed test of runtime/pprof on koji
Summary: sporadic failed test of runtime/pprof on koji
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED EOL
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: golang
Version: 22
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Vincent Batts
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-05-08 12:36 UTC by Vincent Batts
Modified: 2016-07-19 11:29 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-07-19 11:29:19 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Vincent Batts 2014-05-08 12:36:58 UTC
Description of problem:
the runtime/prrof

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
golang-1.2.1

How reproducible:
about 1/3 times.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. build the golang src.rpm on the fedora koji service
2.
3.

Actual results:
ok  	regexp/syntax	1.210s
ok  	runtime	10.717s
?   	runtime/cgo	[no test files]
ok  	runtime/debug	0.005s
--- FAIL: TestBlockProfile (0.16 seconds)
	pprof_test.go:332: Bad chan close entry, expect:
		
		[0-9]+ [0-9]+ @ 0x[0-9,a-f]+ 0x[0-9,a-f]+ 0x[0-9,a-f]+ 0x[0-9,a-f]+ 0x[0-9,a-f]+
		#	0x[0-9,a-f]+	runtime\.chanrecv1\+0x[0-9,a-f]+	.*/src/pkg/runtime/chan.c:[0-9]+
		#	0x[0-9,a-f]+	runtime/pprof_test\.blockChanClose\+0x[0-9,a-f]+	.*/src/pkg/runtime/pprof/pprof_test.go:[0-9]+
		#	0x[0-9,a-f]+	runtime/pprof_test\.TestBlockProfile\+0x[0-9,a-f]+	.*/src/pkg/runtime/pprof/pprof_test.go:[0-9]+
		
		got:
		--- contention:
		cycles/second=2533443292
		26109144 1 @ 0x804c41f 0x807b193 0x807acd2 0x8075208 0x805d460
		#	0x804c41f	runtime.chanrecv1+0x2f				/usr/lib/golang/src/pkg/runtime/chan.c:446
		#	0x807b193	runtime/pprof_test.blockChanRecv+0x93		/builddir/build/BUILD/go/src/pkg/runtime/pprof/pprof_test.go:345
		#	0x807acd2	runtime/pprof_test.TestBlockProfile+0x122	/builddir/build/BUILD/go/src/pkg/runtime/pprof/pprof_test.go:320
		#	0x8075208	testing.tRunner+0x88				/usr/lib/golang/src/pkg/testing/testing.go:391
		
		26082450 1 @ 0x809b1ae 0x807b58b 0x807acd2 0x8075208 0x805d460
		#	0x809b1ae	sync.(*Mutex).Lock+0xce				/usr/lib/golang/src/pkg/sync/mutex.go:66
		#	0x807b58b	runtime/pprof_test.blockMutex+0x6b		/builddir/build/BUILD/go/src/pkg/runtime/pprof/pprof_test.go:399
		#	0x807acd2	runtime/pprof_test.TestBlockProfile+0x122	/builddir/build/BUILD/go/src/pkg/runtime/pprof/pprof_test.go:320
		#	0x8075208	testing.tRunner+0x88				/usr/lib/golang/src/pkg/testing/testing.go:391
		
		26018053 1 @ 0x804c9ff 0x807b519 0x807acd2 0x8075208 0x805d460
		#	0x804c9ff	runtime.selectgo+0xf				/usr/lib/golang/src/pkg/runtime/chan.c:840
		#	0x807b519	runtime/pprof_test.blockSelectSendSync+0x119	/builddir/build/BUILD/go/src/pkg/runtime/pprof/pprof_test.go:386
		#	0x807acd2	runtime/pprof_test.TestBlockProfile+0x122	/builddir/build/BUILD/go/src/pkg/runtime/pprof/pprof_test.go:320
		#	0x8075208	testing.tRunner+0x88				/usr/lib/golang/src/pkg/testing/testing.go:391
		
		26013865 1 @ 0x804c9ff 0x807b3f0 0x807acd2 0x8075208 0x805d460
		#	0x804c9ff	runtime.selectgo+0xf				/usr/lib/golang/src/pkg/runtime/chan.c:840
		#	0x807b3f0	runtime/pprof_test.blockSelectRecvAsync+0x110	/builddir/build/BUILD/go/src/pkg/runtime/pprof/pprof_test.go:373
		#	0x807acd2	runtime/pprof_test.TestBlockProfile+0x122	/builddir/build/BUILD/go/src/pkg/runtime/pprof/pprof_test.go:320
		#	0x8075208	testing.tRunner+0x88				/usr/lib/golang/src/pkg/testing/testing.go:391
		
		25939238 1 @ 0x804c3df 0x807b238 0x807acd2 0x8075208 0x805d460
		#	0x804c3df	runtime.chansend1+0x3f				/usr/lib/golang/src/pkg/runtime/chan.c:438
		#	0x807b238	runtime/pprof_test.blockChanSend+0x98		/builddir/build/BUILD/go/src/pkg/runtime/pprof/pprof_test.go:354
		#	0x807acd2	runtime/pprof_test.TestBlockProfile+0x122	/builddir/build/BUILD/go/src/pkg/runtime/pprof/pprof_test.go:320
		#	0x8075208	testing.tRunner+0x88				/usr/lib/golang/src/pkg/testing/testing.go:391
		
FAIL
FAIL	runtime/pprof	6.366s
?   	runtime/race	[no test files]
ok  	sort	0.095s
ok  	strconv	0.700s
ok  	strings	0.147s
ok  	sync	0.045s
ok  	sync/atomic	0.055s
ok  	syscall	0.021s
ok  	testing	0.005s
?   	testing/iotest	[no test files]
ok  	testing/quick	0.043s
ok  	text/scanner	0.007s
ok  	text/tabwriter	0.006s
ok  	text/template	0.057s
ok  	text/template/parse	0.017s
ok  	time	2.643s
ok  	unicode	0.016s
ok  	unicode/utf16	0.005s
ok  	unicode/utf8	0.019s
?   	unsafe	[no test files]
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.I6MoAU (%check)
RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.I6MoAU (%check)
Child return code was: 1
EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output.
 # ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target i686 --nodeps  builddir/build/SPECS/golang.spec']
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line 70, in trace
    result = func(*args, **kw)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mockbuild/util.py", line 376, in do
    raise mockbuild.exception.Error, ("Command failed. See logs for output.\n # %s" % (command,), child.returncode)
Error: Command failed. See logs for output.
 # ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target i686 --nodeps  builddir/build/SPECS/golang.spec']
LEAVE do --> EXCEPTION RAISED

Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Jaroslav Reznik 2015-03-03 15:47:28 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle.
Changing version to '22'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22

Comment 2 Fedora End Of Life 2016-07-19 11:29:19 UTC
Fedora 22 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-07-19. Fedora 22 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.