Bug 1097155 - Way too many non-fixed clustering bugs in Bug Fixes
Summary: Way too many non-fixed clustering bugs in Bug Fixes
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6
Classification: JBoss
Component: Documentation
Version: 6.3.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ER3
: EAP 6.3.0
Assignee: eap-docs
QA Contact: Russell Dickenson
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: eap63-beta-blockers
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-05-13 09:19 UTC by Ladislav Thon
Modified: 2014-08-14 15:22 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Build Name: 22702, 6.3.0 Release Notes-6.3-1 Build Date: 12-05-2014 07:33:36 Topic ID: 30481-632191 [Latest]
Last Closed: 2014-06-28 15:37:03 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ladislav Thon 2014-05-13 09:19:24 UTC
Title: Components

Oh crap, there is no "Report a bug" link in chapter "7. Changes in this release". Sorry about wrong metadata.

This only applies to chapter "7. Changes in this release", subchapter "7.1. Bug Fixes", section "Clustering".

Describe the issue:

The "Clustering" section of subchapter "7.1. Bug Fixes" contains way too many entries with "TEXT MISSING". I know that for those bugs that are fixed (920079, 927615, 1039585, 916988, 956904, 990567, 917010, 924802), you requested documentation text from Paul, but a lot of bugs are still present (922699, 917635, 959951, 901000, 993041, 901162). If these are supposed to be documented in release notes, then they should be documented as known issues, not as bug fixes.

Suggestions for improvement:

Majority of these bugs most probably don't even need to be documented. But I'm of course not the one that should decide that :-)

Additional information:

Those entries that have documentation text are fine.

Reviewed in Revision 6.3.0-3.

Comment 1 Scott Mumford 2014-05-13 23:14:56 UTC
Thanks Ladislav,

I've worked on those blank issues as best I can, either adding a note or marking for exclusion as best I could deem.

901000, 993041, 920079, 927615, 1039585, 916988 and 924802 are still awaiting information from Paul Ferraro. Unless we exclude these bugs, there's nothing we can do until that information is received.

Comment 2 Nichola Moore 2014-05-14 01:28:28 UTC
I have been over Scott's list above. There is still no response to any of the needinfo requests. Essentially nothing has changed since 13/05.2014.

Comment 3 Paul Ferraro 2014-05-14 16:52:39 UTC
The clustering team has provided the appropriate info for 901000, 993041, 920079, 927615, 1039585, 916988 and 924802.

Comment 4 Scott Mumford 2014-05-14 23:07:48 UTC
Thanks Paul.

I'll set to work ensuring those bugs are included in the Release Notes document.

Comment 5 Scott Mumford 2014-05-14 23:46:22 UTC
All done. Most were not required.
Thanks again Paul.

Moving to MODIFIED until the next review version of the Release Notes is available.

Comment 7 Ladislav Thon 2014-05-15 07:43:24 UTC
Documentation for 956904:

failre -> failure

Documentation for 922699:

This was marked requires_doc_text- based on a historical comment that is now out of sync with reality. Needs reevaluation, added needinfo on Paul to that bug.

Other than that, it's all fixed, thanks! But I need to move it back to assigned :-)

Comment 8 Radoslav Husar 2014-05-15 09:02:56 UTC
Fixed the text in 956904.

Correct, 922699 should be documented, I will update it shortly.

Comment 11 Ladislav Thon 2014-05-15 13:28:46 UTC
Reviewed in Revision 6.3.0-6.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.