Spec URL: http://codeblock.fedorapeople.org/packages/adobe-source-serif-pro-fonts//adobe-source-serif-pro-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://codeblock.fedorapeople.org/packages/adobe-source-serif-pro-fonts//adobe-source-serif-pro-fonts-1.014-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Source Serif Pro is a set of OpenType fonts to complement the Source Sans Pro family.
This package built on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6862846
Can you add fonts appstream metainfo files? Please add it and update the package and I will review this. You can take the example for adding metainfo file from http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/adobe-source-sans-pro-fonts.git/plain/source-sans-pro.metainfo.xml
there is no reply here. I am closing this review.
I am interested in getting this font into Fedora. I have updated the package based on the updates for adobe-source-code-pro-fonts (bug 1246597) and adobe-source-sans-pro-fonts (bug 1246765). Spec URL: https://ikkoku.de/~suraia/adobe-source-serif-pro-fonts/adobe-source-serif-pro-fonts.spec SRPM URL: https://ikkoku.de/~suraia/adobe-source-serif-pro-fonts/adobe-source-serif-pro-fonts-1.017-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: Source Serif Pro is a set of OpenType fonts to complement the Source Sans Pro family. Fedora Account System Username: suraia
Are you still interested in reviewing the package? Please give some feedback so I can find another reviewer if necessary. Thanks!
(In reply to Michael Kuhn from comment #4) > I am interested in getting this font into Fedora. I have updated the package > based on the updates for adobe-source-code-pro-fonts (bug 1246597) and > adobe-source-sans-pro-fonts (bug 1246765). > > Spec URL: > https://ikkoku.de/~suraia/adobe-source-serif-pro-fonts/adobe-source-serif- > pro-fonts.spec > SRPM URL: > https://ikkoku.de/~suraia/adobe-source-serif-pro-fonts/adobe-source-serif- > pro-fonts-1.017-1.fc23.src.rpm > > Description: > Source Serif Pro is a set of OpenType fonts to complement the Source Sans > Pro family. > > Fedora Account System Username: suraia You should open a new bugzilla. This bugzilla was already closed. If you were the original submitter then you could have opened it back but you are a fresh package submitter.
(In reply to Michael Kuhn from comment #5) > Are you still interested in reviewing the package? Please give some feedback > so I can find another reviewer if necessary. Thanks! Sorry I don't understand, Had we talked before and I promised for this package review to you?
I forgot to add FE-DEADREVIEW on this bug last time. Correcting it now. See its meaning at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Special_blocker_tickets
> You should open a new bugzilla. This bugzilla was already closed. If you > were the original submitter then you could have opened it back but you are a > fresh package submitter. Sorry about that. I guess I did not read the policy in enough detail. > Sorry I don't understand, Had we talked before and I promised for this package review to you? No, we have not, sorry if I came across harshly. I just assumed you might still be interested in still reviewing the package. Anyway, I will open a new review request, thanks for the fast feedback!
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1371635 ***