From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-AT; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20031030 Description of problem: Multiple problems. I have a HFC-2BS0 based ISDN card. It used to work fine in RedHat-8.0, was initially broken in RedHat 9, worked fine again in a later RedHat 9 update and is broken again in Fedora Core 1. The problem is probably related to the GUI setup tools. The first problem is, that I cannot reach my usual ISP. Configuration works fine, but after dialing I don't get a connection and the Network Configuration tool just gives up. BTW, the ISP in question is Freenet as configured in the German national ISP list. The second problem happens when I chose an alternative provider (Claranet). In this case everything seems to work just fine, ipppd makes a PPP connection, I get an IP address, but the Network Configuration tool just doesn't notice. Despite the fact that the connection has been established, it claims that the connection is inactive. To disconnect I have to send a TERM signal to the ipppd. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: Use the Internet Connection wizard to try to setup a ISDN account that connects to either Freenet or Claranet in Germany. Actual Results: A broken ISDN configuration. Expected Results: A working ISDN configuration (just like in the later RedHat 9 release) Additional info:
worth a try: give your setup the nickname "ippp0"
I experience problem #2 with my 56K modem. It allows me to configure, and connect, but it always shows the status as "inactive". Makes disconnecting problematic. I have the GNOME modem-blinkenlight tool up, and *it* says i'm connected. I cannot disconnect from the GNOME tool, though.
Based on the date this bug was created, it appears to have been reported against rawhide during the development of a Fedora release that is no longer maintained. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained. If this bug remains in NEEDINFO thirty (30) days from now, we will automatically close it. If you can reproduce this bug in a maintained Fedora version (7, 8, or rawhide), please change this bug to the respective version and change the status to ASSIGNED. (If you're unable to change the bug's version or status, add a comment to the bug and someone will change it for you.) Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point. The process we're following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again.
This bug has been in NEEDINFO for more than 30 days since feedback was first requested. As a result we are closing it. If you can reproduce this bug in the future against a maintained Fedora version please feel free to reopen it against that version. The process we're following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp