Description of problem: The directory /usr/share/langtable is unowned. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): langtable-0.0.24-1 on all f19, f20 and rawhide How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum install langtable-data 2. rpm -qf /usr/share/langtable Actual results: # rpm -qf /usr/share/langtable file /usr/share/langtable is not owned by any package Expected results: /usr/share/langtable to be owned Additional info: - Technically, it would be sufficient to let langtable own this directory, however, I recommend to let both langtable and langtable-data own /usr/share/langtable. - As I consider this issue to be obvious and minor, I am inclined to apply my provenpackager privileges to resolve this issue.
langtable-0.0.24-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/langtable-0.0.24-2.fc19
langtable-0.0.24-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/langtable-0.0.24-2.fc20
Package langtable-0.0.24-2.fc19: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing langtable-0.0.24-2.fc19' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-6613/langtable-0.0.24-2.fc19 then log in and leave karma (feedback).
langtable-0.0.24-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
ralf, why do you recommend having both packages own the directory? as langtable-data requires langtable, just having langtable own it ought to be entirely sufficient (and arguably having both own it is excessive).
(In reply to Adam Williamson from comment #5) > ralf, why do you recommend having both packages own the directory? as > langtable-data requires langtable, just having langtable own it ought to be > entirely sufficient (and arguably having both own it is excessive). cf. my initial posting/comment #1. There I said, it's "technically sufficient to let langtable own this directory". The rationale for this is exactly what you say: Langtable-data already requires langtable. In general, I am however recommending "multiple ownership", because this assures directory stay owned rpm-wise, when package hierarchies change or when there is no strictly hierarchical package dependency (aka. "plugins").
langtable-0.0.24-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.