Bug 1100873 - Review Request: drupal7-views_slideshow - Views Slideshow can be used to create a slideshow of any content
Summary: Review Request: drupal7-views_slideshow - Views Slideshow can be used to crea...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jared Smith
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-05-23 16:40 UTC by Peter Borsa
Modified: 2014-08-09 07:31 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: drupal7-views_slideshow-3.1-1.fc20
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-08-09 00:08:08 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
jsmith.fedora: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Peter Borsa 2014-05-23 16:40:15 UTC
Spec URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal7-views_slideshow.spec
SRPM URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal7-views_slideshow-3.1-1.fc21.src.rpm
Description: Views Slideshow can be used to create a slideshow of any content (not just images) that can appear in a View. Powered by jQuery, it is heavily customizable: you may choose slideshow settings for each View you create.
Fedora Account System Username: asrob

koji url:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6882953

rpmlint output:

rpmlint drupal7-views_slideshow.spec ~/Downloads/drupal7-views_slideshow-3.1-1.fc21.src.rpm 
drupal7-views_slideshow.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) slideshow -> sideshow, slide show, slide-show
drupal7-views_slideshow.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US slideshow -> sideshow, slide show, slide-show
drupal7-views_slideshow.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US jQuery -> j Query, query, equerry
drupal7-views_slideshow.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US customizable -> customization
1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.

Comment 1 Jared Smith 2014-05-23 17:57:19 UTC
This package looks pretty good, other than the Buildroot and %clean issues noted at th top of the "SHOULD items" section.  Please correct those two items and I will approve this package.



Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
     Note: %defattr present but not needed
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
     in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
     for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[!]: Buildroot is not present
     Note: Buildroot: present but not needed
[!]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
     Note: %clean present but not required
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: drupal7-views_slideshow-3.1-1.fc21.noarch.rpm
          drupal7-views_slideshow-3.1-1.fc21.src.rpm
drupal7-views_slideshow.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) slideshow -> sideshow, slide show, slide-show
drupal7-views_slideshow.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US slideshow -> sideshow, slide show, slide-show
drupal7-views_slideshow.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US jQuery -> j Query, query, equerry
drupal7-views_slideshow.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US customizable -> customization
drupal7-views_slideshow.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) slideshow -> sideshow, slide show, slide-show
drupal7-views_slideshow.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US slideshow -> sideshow, slide show, slide-show
drupal7-views_slideshow.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US jQuery -> j Query, query, equerry
drupal7-views_slideshow.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US customizable -> customization
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint drupal7-views_slideshow
drupal7-views_slideshow.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) slideshow -> sideshow, slide show, slide-show
drupal7-views_slideshow.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US slideshow -> sideshow, slide show, slide-show
drupal7-views_slideshow.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US jQuery -> j Query, query, equerry
drupal7-views_slideshow.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US customizable -> customization
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'



Requires
--------
drupal7-views_slideshow (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    drupal7(core)
    php-pcre
    php-xml



Provides
--------
drupal7-views_slideshow:
    drupal7(views_slideshow)
    drupal7(views_slideshow_cycle)
    drupal7-views_slideshow



Source checksums
----------------
http://ftp.drupal.org/files/projects/views_slideshow-7.x-3.1.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : d61c359ac28e0b40087e8ede1a6b72276f784e31a61474a1e0c6ad7e89d7bb65
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : d61c359ac28e0b40087e8ede1a6b72276f784e31a61474a1e0c6ad7e89d7bb65


Generated by fedora-review 0.5.1 (bb9bf27) last change: 2013-12-13
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1100873
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG

Comment 3 Jared Smith 2014-05-23 18:44:08 UTC
Approved.

Comment 4 Peter Borsa 2014-05-23 19:01:42 UTC
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: drupal7-views_slideshow
Short Description: Views Slideshow can be used to create a slideshow of any content
Upstream URL: https://drupal.org/project/views_slideshow
Owners: asrob jsmith siwinski
Branches: f20 el6 epel7
InitialCC:

Comment 5 Gwyn Ciesla 2014-05-27 13:17:27 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 6 Gwyn Ciesla 2014-05-27 13:24:59 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2014-05-28 16:47:56 UTC
drupal7-views_slideshow-3.1-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-views_slideshow-3.1-1.fc20

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2014-05-28 16:48:41 UTC
drupal7-views_slideshow-3.1-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-views_slideshow-3.1-1.el6

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2014-05-29 16:59:00 UTC
drupal7-views_slideshow-3.1-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2014-08-09 00:08:08 UTC
drupal7-views_slideshow-3.1-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2014-08-09 07:31:11 UTC
drupal7-views_slideshow-3.1-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.