Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/google-ekmukta-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/google-ekmukta-fonts-1.101-0.1.20140526.fc20.src.rpm Description: Ek Mukta is a Unicode compliant, versatile, contemporary, humanist, mono-linear typeface available in seven weights, supporting Devanagari and Latin scripts. Fedora Account System Username: pnemade Koji scratch build -> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6890578
A suggestion: how about changing the summary to "A Unicode compliant mono-linear typeface"
Thanks. I have done the above change and uploaded new package at same location.
Latest release is 1.2.2 https://github.com/girish-dalvi/Ek-Mukta/releases
Let's use then upstream references only. Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/ekmukta-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/ekmukta-fonts-1.2.2-1.fc20.src.rpm koji scratch build -> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7135613
Approved rpmlint ekmukta-fonts-1.2.2-1.fc20.noarch.rpm ekmukta-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Ek -> E, K, Es 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses found. Please check the source files for licenses manually. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [-]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [- ]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses found. Please check the source files for licenses manually. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [-]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [-]: Package does not generate any conflict. [ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Thanks Anish for the review! New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ekmukta-fonts Short Description: Ek Mukta is a Unicode compliant, mono-linear typeface Upstream URL: https://github.com/girish-dalvi/Ek-Mukta Owners: pnemade Branches: f20 f21 epel7 InitialCC: fonts-sig i18n-team
Git done (by process-git-requests).
ekmukta-fonts-1.2.2-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ekmukta-fonts-1.2.2-1.fc20
ekmukta-fonts-1.2.2-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository.
ekmukta-fonts-1.2.2-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.