Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1101765 - content views with date filters skip packages with no errata
Summary: content views with date filters skip packages with no errata
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Content Management
Version: 6.0.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: Justin Sherrill
QA Contact: Ales Dujicek
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-05-27 21:06 UTC by Erik M Jacobs
Modified: 2019-09-25 20:32 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-07-02 14:06:50 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Erik M Jacobs 2014-05-27 21:06:58 UTC 
Description of problem:
When creating a content view on rhel-6-server-rpms, using an Errata by Date and Type filter results in packages that never had errata being missing from the published view.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
createrepo-0.9.9-21.2.pulp.el6sat.noarch
foreman-1.6.0.13-1.el6sat.noarch
foreman-compute-1.6.0.13-1.el6sat.noarch
foreman-gce-1.6.0.13-1.el6sat.noarch
foreman-libvirt-1.6.0.13-1.el6sat.noarch
foreman-ovirt-1.6.0.13-1.el6sat.noarch
foreman-postgresql-1.6.0.13-1.el6sat.noarch
foreman-proxy-1.6.0.6-1.el6sat.noarch
foreman-vmware-1.6.0.13-1.el6sat.noarch
katello-1.5.0-24.el6sat.noarch
katello-ca-1.0-1.noarch
katello-certs-tools-1.5.5-1.el6sat.noarch
katello-installer-0.0.44-1.el6sat.noarch
m2crypto-0.21.1.pulp-8.el6sat.x86_64
mod_wsgi-3.4-1.pulp.el6sat.x86_64
pulp-katello-plugins-0.3-1.el6sat.noarch
pulp-nodes-common-2.4.0-0.18.beta.el6sat.noarch
pulp-nodes-parent-2.4.0-0.18.beta.el6sat.noarch
pulp-puppet-plugins-2.4.0-0.18.beta.el6sat.noarch
pulp-puppet-tools-2.4.0-0.18.beta.el6sat.noarch
pulp-rpm-plugins-2.4.0-0.18.beta.el6sat.noarch
pulp-selinux-2.3.1-1.el6.noarch
pulp-server-2.4.0-0.18.beta.el6sat.noarch
python-isodate-0.5.0-1.pulp.el6sat.noarch
python-kombu-3.0.15-5.pulp.el6sat.noarch
python-pulp-bindings-2.4.0-0.18.beta.el6sat.noarch
python-pulp-common-2.4.0-0.18.beta.el6sat.noarch
python-pulp-puppet-common-2.4.0-0.18.beta.el6sat.noarch
python-pulp-rpm-common-2.4.0-0.18.beta.el6sat.noarch
ruby193-rubygem-foreman_bootdisk-2.0.6-1.1.el6sat.noarch
ruby193-rubygem-foreman_discovery-1.3.0-0.1.rc2.el6sat.noarch
ruby193-rubygem-foreman_hooks-0.3.5-2.el6sat.noarch
ruby193-rubygem-foreman-redhat_access-0.0.3-1.el6sat.noarch
ruby193-rubygem-foreman-tasks-0.5.4-2.el6sat.noarch
ruby193-rubygem-katello-1.5.0-48.el6sat.noarch
rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman-0.1.0-15.el6sat.noarch
rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman_tasks-0.0.2-6.el6sat.noarch
rubygem-hammer_cli_katello-0.0.3-26.el6sat.noarch

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a content view
2. Add the RHEL6 Server product/repos
3. Create an Errata by Date & Type filter for "19-November-2013"
4. Publish and promote it
5. Do a content search or a "yum info" on compat-readline5

Actual results:
The package is not in the promoted/published repo.

Expected results:
The package should be there.

Additional info:
https://rhn.redhat.com/rhn/software/packages/details/Overview.do?pid=585642

compat-readline5 was introduced in EL6 and never had any updates, therefore there are no errata related to it.

It appears that only packages that had some kind of errata at least once are included when using this date filter.

I think what we need to be doing is something like:

- When a user creates an "Errata by Date & Type" filter and sets a date
  - We should include all packages' errata before that date
  - We should include all packages with no errata in the repo
Comment 1 Justin Sherrill 2014-05-27 21:08:23 UTC 
http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/5449
Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2014-05-27 21:13:35 UTC 
Since this issue was entered in Red Hat Bugzilla, the release flag has been
set to ? to ensure that it is properly evaluated for this release.
Comment 6 Ales Dujicek 2014-06-24 13:13:26 UTC 
Verified. Satellite-6.0.3-RHEL-6-20140620.0

compat-readline5 was listed using content search
Comment 7 Bryan Kearney 2014-07-02 14:06:50 UTC 
This was delivered with 6.0.3, which is the Satellite 6 Beta.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.