Bug 1103457 - Review Request: liquid-dsp - Software-Defined Radio Digital Signal Processing Library
Review Request: liquid-dsp - Software-Defined Radio Digital Signal Processing...
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
All Linux
unspecified Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2014-05-31 20:52 EDT by Florian Tani
Modified: 2016-07-29 09:20 EDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2016-07-29 09:20:00 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Florian Tani 2014-05-31 20:52:21 EDT
Spec URL: http://openlabs.cc/linux/fedora/liquid-dsp/liquid-dsp.spec
SRPM URL: http://openlabs.cc/linux/fedora/liquid-dsp/liquid-dsp-1.2.0-1.fc18.src.rpm
Description: liquid-dsp is a free and open-source digital signal processing (DSP)library designed specifically for software-defined radios on embedded platforms.
The aim is to provide a lightweight DSP library that does not rely on a myriad of external dependencies or proprietary and otherwise cumbersome frameworks. 
All signal processing elements are designed to be flexible, scalable, and dynamic, including filters, filter design,oscillators, modems, synchronizers, and complex mathematical operations.

Fedora Account System Username: ftani
Comment 1 Michael Schwendt 2014-06-05 15:30:51 EDT
FAS says:

| Error!
| The following error(s) have occurred with your request:
|    username: 'ftani' does not exist.

It seems you meant: floriantani
Comment 2 Michael Schwendt 2014-06-05 15:33:41 EDT
Btw, same here as with your other review request (bug 1092431):

| %files

The built package does not include anything other than these %doc files. That's not the only mistake in this spec file, but it tells that you haven't tested your packages at all. :-(
Comment 3 Miroslav Suchý 2015-10-20 16:46:52 EDT
Florian, please update and test you spec and srpm before applying.
Here are some pointers:
Comment 4 Miroslav Suchý 2016-07-29 09:20:00 EDT
No response so far. Closing. Please reopen if you want to continue.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.