User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/24.0 Build Identifier: The words "specific" are used to incorrectly in the document to refer to either "explicit" or "role-based" permissions. The words don't translate in the doc. Reproducible: Always
I am providing the full comments of the customer. It looks like there's a mistake in using the right terms but maybe this might give you more context to work with. Comments: "Red Hat documentation is pretty detailed and easy to follow. However, we have had very big issues with one particular document regarding Oracle database permission configuration (satellite). Using actual technical terms when referencing other technologies, for example: Oracle Database permissions. There is no such thing as "specific". Oracle database permissions are either explicit or role-based. When Oracle DBAs read "specific" it doesn't translate." Hope this helps.
"specific" occurs twice in other contexts. "Oracle" occurs once in the Legal Notice. "database" occurs not at all. Without specific information I can't fix anything.