Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Cause:
User creates a constraint for a resource or group inside a clone or master/slave resource.
Consequence:
Created constraint does not have any effect on a cluster resources.
Fix:
Check whether the resource is inside a clone or master/slave resource when creating constraints.
Result:
Pcs displays an error message informing the user that he/she should use the clone or master/slave resource to put the constraint on including the name of the resource.
Created attachment 907756[details]
Output of 'pcs cluster cib'
Description of problem:
Cloning a group of resources and then creating location constraint avoiding the
group from running on one of the nodes seems to be ignored.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pacemaker-1.1.10-29.el7.x86_64
pcs-0.9.115-32.el7.x86_64
How reproducible: always
Steps to Reproduce:
1) for a in 1 2 3; do pcs resource create dummy-$a Dummy --group dummies; done
2) pcs resource clone dummies
3) pcs constraint location dummies avoids <clusternode>
Actual results: nothing happens
Expected results: resource not running on <clusternode>
Does 'pcs resource clone dummies' emit a clone name? (It should if not).
Thats the name you should use in the location constraint, not that of the thing inside the clone.
I do not get anything back when running 'pcs resource clone dummies'. The clone is named dummies-clone.
Trying to create the constraint with 'dummies-clone' works indeed.
What is the correct behaviour of the constraints on groups/resources when they are cloned? It seems that they are just ignored even when they existed before the
resource has been cloned.
The correct behaviour is to never refer to the "thing inside the clone/group" in constraints. IIRC pcs even modifies existing constraints to observe this.
Chris is going to change pcs to emit some text to the effect of "don't use the non-clone name anymore" when a resource is cloned.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0415.html
Created attachment 907756 [details] Output of 'pcs cluster cib' Description of problem: Cloning a group of resources and then creating location constraint avoiding the group from running on one of the nodes seems to be ignored. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pacemaker-1.1.10-29.el7.x86_64 pcs-0.9.115-32.el7.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1) for a in 1 2 3; do pcs resource create dummy-$a Dummy --group dummies; done 2) pcs resource clone dummies 3) pcs constraint location dummies avoids <clusternode> Actual results: nothing happens Expected results: resource not running on <clusternode>